Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think Commander in Chief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:18 PM
Original message
Do you think Commander in Chief
is paving the way a) for a woman president, and b) for moving a third party into a potentially dominating position?
The program seems to go overboard on portraying the Pres. as a brilliant, gutsy strategist with all the trappings of family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nah, I don't think it's anything more than a tv show (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hunh?
Please elaborate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. My local morning guy/wingut nearly freeper DJ thought so
His fear is that it's paving the way for Hillary. He sees leftist leanings in it as well, even though there are supposed to be bi-partisan writers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is a well written and intriging show.
I hope it will influence some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demi_Babe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I take it for what it is
a TV show and I have enjoyed watching it very much. I think that it will aid in warming some folks up to a woman President. No harm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think they are trying, at least part of that.
Lou Dobbs had the writer of West Wing on his show. He admitted that he writes things into the show that are prompted by the political climate of the day. I suspect CIF is the same.

Even though both are TV shows, I'm sure both have some effect on the public perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calistone Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ever since...
Bush started alienating neocons way back in 2001 - Starting with the Patriot Act, and sweeping assaults on the Constitution that the righties claim to love so much - The Libertarians have had a real opportunity to increase their power. Why havent they taken advantage of the fractiousness of both parties? Southern Conservative Dems like myself as well as disaffected neocons might be more attracted to the Libs if they actually DID anything - Besides talk about legalizing drug use that is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're really trying hard, ain'tcha?
:thumbsup:




:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is a political fantasy show like the West Wing.
A non-partisan, can do, leader who can reach across party lines and act in the best interest of the country is most Americans' political wet dream.

Hell, a take charge leader, who's outspoken, brilliant, and well intentioned AND who has a normal family life is so far divorced from political reality that it is truly a fantasy--and the fact that the show is popular, as is West Wing, shows that there's a hunger for that sort of leader in America.

Could this pave the way for the acceptance of a woman in the White House? Sure. Does this have to be Hillary Clinton? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. While Commander in Chief is trying to pave the way for Hillary
E-Ring is criticizing the Clinton Administration (Rwanda last night) and promoting the War on Terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francine Frensky Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why are men like you so intimidated by a strong woman??
<<The program seems to go overboard on portraying the Pres. as a brilliant, gutsy strategist with all the trappings of family.>>

To me, Mac is a good strong leader, much like Bartlett was on West Wing. Did you find it "overboard" when Bartlett was brilliant??? Why does no one bother to ask that same question of all the millions of shows and movies that show men as super strong and brilliant leaders and heros????

There is so much embedded sexism in this country. We need about 50 shows like this one just to balance out how biased our entertainment industry is in its treatment of women.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. I believe itis trying to portray the problems, inherently, with not
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 09:09 AM by Totally Committed
only the two Party system, but the two Parties, themselves. I think it's trying to shake America into thinking about the importance of the electoral process, and whom they vote for in the first place. It presents a scenario the ordinary American never really thinks about, and it does show that a woman can govern as POTUS effectively.

I do not, however, see a likeness between the character of the female POTUS, and Hillary at all. If anything, they're trying to help us see the wisdom of say, a Barbara Boxer as first female POTUS. Geena Davis' character does not have a huge political money-making juggernaut with political favors her husband accumulated while he was POTUS greasing the wheels behind her. She's out there alone. Big difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC