Bluesplayer
(660 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:41 AM
Original message |
"Sexists" against Miers - it goes both ways |
|
Any charges that Miers is being opposed because she is a woman should be met with the reminder that * selected her (at pickles's insistence) because she is a woman.
Who is it that is using gender as a criteria?
|
Hobarticus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
1. But, but....the GOP is against Affirmative Action! |
|
Youy know, so-called "unfairly choosing unqualified candidates to fill a quota".
How can this be?
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Okay-TWO sets of footage I saw this morning-Meirs is surrounded by |
|
HOTTIES!!
One was walking down a sidewalk outside (serious hotties behind her) and one was her inside in a hallway (a noticeably well built women in pink behind her). Coincidence?
|
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
3. That's idiocy to begin with... |
|
we should oppose her for her lack of a record, in other words, inexperience. I thought we learned our lesson from Brownie, why the hell should she be a Supreme Court Judge? There is no great shortage of female Judges who ARE qualified, a pool of great experience, why not appoint one of them?
|
Bluesplayer
(660 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
we'd hate them because they're women, too.
|
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Repubs are the women haters, so turn the tables on them... |
|
Hell if I were born 20 years earlier, I would have busted my butt to try to get the ERA passed, but I wasn't, oh well.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message |