Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Indicted Bin Laden - And He's Still Around........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:47 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald Indicted Bin Laden - And He's Still Around........
just heard that Fitzgerald indicted Bin Laden for his role in the first WTC bombing. I'm concerned now. What good did that indictment do? Do you think Rove and Company are looking to that indictment and thinking that they will get off as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I suppose if they plan on hiding out in the hills of Afghanistan
that might be a concern :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's kind of a silly comparison isn't it?
If you indict Bin Laden, how do you then arrest him and put him on trial? He's not exactly easy to find.

Where as Rove, on the other hand, well, we know right where he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bin Laden has been on the run for years now
I don't see Bush hiding in....the plains of Texas in the same way that Bin Laden is hiding the hills of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. yeah...maybe those old WWII war crime indictments were useless too...
cause that's the only shred of hope your buddies Rove and Company have left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bin Laden wasn't involved in the first WTC attack.
In 1996 when Clinton was trying to get Bin Laden there was no indictment of him. The reason Clinton couldn't get Bin Laden out of Somalia was because there were no charges against him. He had not been implicated in any crimes in the US. Clinton knew what he could do, and wanted him caught, but he had no jurisdiction, so Bin Laden was able to escape to Afghanistan.

I don't know what Fitzgerald or anyone could have indicted UBL for over the first WTC attack, unless it was accessory after the fact, or whatever the legal case was. That had to be after 1996.

As for Bush, we know where he lives. We can get him whenever charges are filed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. IF so, it's not Fitzgerald's fault that Bush captured Hussein but not OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Whats the code for the ....
Smiley riding the short bus to school?

Oh god the PC police are going get on me for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, Bin Laden wasn't exactly living in the area.......
Did you expect him to turn himself in? Rove, Libby and Cheney will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fitzgerald knows exactly where to find all the Plame players
OBL was supposed to becaught dead or alive - Fitzgerald is the prosecution not a tracker, for Pete's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC