Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't repugs care about vets? Kerry tries to fix GI Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:46 PM
Original message
Why don't repugs care about vets? Kerry tries to fix GI Bill
Kerry sponsors a bi-partisan effort to fix the GI Bill

http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=1...

GI EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS -- (Senate - October 07, 2005)

Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, the original G.I. bill in 1944 made a sacred bargain: honor our troops for their sacrifice, and keep faith with our veterans by helping them readjust to civilian life. Historically, G.I. bill educational benefits have risen and fallen--at times covering over 100 percent of the cost of tuition, books, supplies and other educational costs. And we know how valuable its benefits have become in recruiting the world's finest military.

But each year, the G.I. bill covers a little bit less of the cost of education in this country. It's a cruel mathematical calculation--the cost of a university education is growing faster than the benefits provided by the G.I. bill. Our troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and around the world fight just as hard and sacrifice just as much as any in American history. Yet the G.I. bill--this great act of gratitude that transformed America 60 years ago--has not kept pace. Today, our troops return home to a G.I. bill that covers only 63 percent of the average price of a 4-year public secondary education. The result is veterans struggling to afford the education they were promised and have earned.

The U.S. Congress should never break promises to our veterans--like 28-year-old Jeff Memmer. As a member of the U.S. Navy, Jeff served two deployments in the Persian Gulf between 1996 and 2002. When he came home, he had to take out tens of thousands of dollars in emergency loans and work part time as a bartender to get through school because costs kept outpacing benefits. He said, ``When I started putting a plan together in 1999, the benefit would have covered two-thirds of my tuition and costs. By the time I got to college, the tuition had increased so much it only covered half, and by the time I graduated it was only covering a third of my expenses.' We are not proposing that veterans live in luxury while they earn their degrees. But clearly, it shouldn't be this hard.

...
The amendment I offered on the Defense appropriations bill, cosponsored by Senator Ensign, would have required a report on G.I. bill educational benefits--who uses them, how they are used, and how they can be improved. The report would have included cost estimates to help us assess various options for increasing the value of the education benefits so they cover more, if not all, of the costs of a 4-year public education.

In the course of preparing this amendment, Senator Ensign and I were invited to work with the Veterans' Affairs Committee to accomplish the same thing. We hope this approach will be successful and will therefore not bring our amendment to a vote.

This is the start of an effort to improve G.I. bill educational benefits. It is not just the right thing to do; it is critical to our national security. We all know that this is the most challenging recruiting environment in the history of the All-Volunteer military. In a 2004 survey, service members reported that the G.I. bill is the number one reason they choose to enlist in the military. We must make sure that we understand how those benefits are being used and what the alternatives are to improve them.

I ask unanimous consent that the text of the letter I sent with Senator Ensign to the Veterans' Affairs Committee, which was mentioned above, be printed in the RECORD.

http://thomas.loc.gov /

Also, please look at this thread and recognize what is or isn't being done for our soldiers.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2157977
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Better yet, why do so many Dems not care about vets? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because their due is due. It's the biggest Bait and Switch, Republicans..
play.Once the get has been got, It's dog eat dog, with THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Repubs figure they do their part by giving them a job. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And just how pathetic is that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Repubs only care when they're told to and what they're told to; in 2000
repubs mocked "nation building", called it "social work for foreign policy" and sneered.

Coz G.W. Bush mocked and sneered at "nation building".

And now? FLIP FLOP.

Now repubs care about "nation building" because G.W. Bush's bullshit excuses for war didn't pan out leaving his bullshit "nation building" as the only bullshit excuse left.

We had to "liberate" those poor Iraqis from Hussein's Purple Plastic People Shredder and give 'em a new "constitution"...one that turns Iraq into an Iranian-style Islamic state, complete with stoning women for adultery.

Do repubs care? Does bush care?

Nope.

We had to "liberate" those poor Afghanis, the poor women being stoned! Now the poor Afghani women are STILL being stoned. Do the repubs care? Does bush care?

Nope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why isn't there a draft?
If this war was such a "noble cause", wouldn't our government be selling war bonds, encouraging Victory Gardens, RAISING taxes on everyone, not just cutting them for the RICH?

Maybe if Cindy Sheehan wasn't swift-boated, these questions may have been answered by now?

Our troops are suffering over there, because rich people don't want to suffer over here! And by RICH people, I mean Bubba Bush's friends, donors and cronys. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because none of them are vets.
Being AWOL from the Alabama National Guard doesn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because no one holds them to their rhetoric.
It's been good enough to wave the flag, wear a lapel pin and put a ribbon their vehicles.

When Amurkins stop falling for their fake flag waving and it costs them politically, they'll "care" (out of self interest) - not before.

BTW, Is it me or has Sen Kerry fought for veterans, low income energy assistance, small business, and California voters all in the last few days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not just you. He continues to fight for lots of things.
The man has been an absolute work-horse since the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, it seems Kerry is trying to do his best to fix
our country; must be a lonely road without much support or fanfare, though I suspect he's not looking for the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hey. If those vets don't care enough about our country to die in the war,
then the hell with them. The NERVE of them still being alive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Chickenhawks care about wars not vets.
Men who avoid serving but send others to fight in wars never care about the broken bodies and spirits of the returning veterans. Veterans have served their purpose to the Chickenhawks and are no longer of use to these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC