Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: WP: Sparring Between McClellan and Reporters Escalates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:28 AM
Original message
WP: WP: Sparring Between McClellan and Reporters Escalates
SAY WHAT?!!! This White House "less enmeshed in strategies to influence news coverage"?!! Makes one's jaw drop!


By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer

... Despite extraordinary tension with reporters during the scandals that led to impeachment, the Clinton press office regularly engaged reporters in attempts to leak favorable information and suppress damaging allegations. In the Bush White House, the press office has been less enmeshed in strategies to influence news coverage, in part because Bush cares less about the daily headlines than his predecessor did. Some reporters say they do not regard McClellan, a Texan who began working for Bush in Austin, as a valuable source....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/15/AR2005101501104.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. aw-w-w, poor scotty. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. It did not work when Ron Ziegler tried this crap in the NIXON WH either
If you change the names to those in the press room during the years of 'No Longer Operative' Ron, it is the same shit, different day!

Roberts said in an interview that President Bush's spokesman "has adopted this siege mentality in which the best way to deflect the question is to attack the questioner. I'm not quite sure who he's playing to -- maybe the segment of the Republican Party that believes we're a bunch of liberals who have our own agenda."

McClellan, for his part, said his job is "to mix it up a little bit and keep them on their toes. Reporters like to swing away at others, but they don't like it when you punch back. The pack mentality goes into overdrive . . . The media's trying to get under our skin and get us off-message. My job is to help the president advance his agenda."

As the White House has been forced onto the defensive in recent weeks -- over Hurricane Katrina, the CIA leak investigation, the Iraq war and the Miers nomination -- the daily sparring between McClellan and the press corps has turned increasingly testy. While there has been an element of theater in these sessions since live television coverage began in 1995 -- clips are now routinely posted on the Internet -- McClellan's rebuttals have lately become more personal.

"There's been an attempt to put reporters on the spot and question the motivation of reporters," said David Gregory, NBC's White House correspondent. "It is irritating, and I for one think it's an attempt by the White House to change the focus from what is a legitimate question to what the talking point is. It's an effort to cast the media as out for red meat."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Howie The Ho-Ho-Ho
Gawd! This one sentence says it all: "In the Bush White House, the press office has been less enmeshed in strategies to influence news coverage, in part because Bush cares less about the daily headlines than his predecessor did."

This is just so much bullshit, it makes for hard trekking. First of all, one must ask Mistah Kurtz what the definition of "press office" is. It has long been exposed, and seems ongoing, that the Bush Administration PAYS "journalists" to do "positive" stories. How about the "faked" "interaction" with soldiers in Iraq just the other day? The Bush administration has been deeply involved in media perception management. Perhaps Mistah Kurtz thinks he can vomit this baloney because he limits his chunks to "press office"?

Then, in the same bullshit sentence, Kurtz regurgitates the most transparent pro-Bush propaganda. In just a few words, Kurtz reminds the reader that Bush is a Man's Man who doesn't rely
on 'headlines'(polls) to tell Him what to do... unlike Clinton who did EVERYTHING based on 'headlines' (polls).

It's quite amazing that Kurtz relies on the Manly Man formula that has been Bush's signature ruse. Bill Clinton was a wimpy-wimp; a girlie-man that 'felt your pain.' Bush is such a Manly-Man-Warrior that he doesn't need 'headlines' to tell him what to do. He just has the 'right stuff' to know how to lead the nation based on his 'gut.'

I can't stand to read or listen to Kurtz any more. As you can see, all it took was one sentence to make me despise that piece of puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Pretty transparent, isn't he? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Two words"
Armstrong Williams

"In the Bush White House, the press office has been less enmeshed in strategies to influence news coverage, in part because Bush cares less about the daily headlines than his predecessor did."

Now what were you saying Howie...

:dunce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Four more words
Maggie Gallagher. Jeff Gannon.

And a few more for Mr. Kurtz to chew on: Talon News. Pay to play. The Secretary of Defense saying that his office would lie to reporters. Terror alerts every time bad daily headlines were coming out. The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. The sudden surfacing of a submarine out on a joy-ride for wealthy Texas contributors. The "trashing" of the White House. War on Afghanistan. War on Iraq. I could go on and on.

Either Mr. Kurtz is delusional, or he thinks we're fucking retarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Talk about a smarmy guy with ZERO credibility
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 03:22 AM by depakid
He's part of the reason that the Post has become such a laughingstock in intelligent circles.

After Kurtz's obvious conflicts of interest (with his wife working for Arny while he was reporting on the campaign)- the fact that he's still working there just goes to show why so few people take them seriosly anymore.

Whatever problems the Times has, the Post has fallen so much farther.

Katherine Graham must be rolling over in her grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Actually, I believe that is the truth, as far as it goes, but Howie
is using this half-truth to hide the fact that the reason the press office has been less enmeshed is because the influence pushing is done by others instead and Howie is one of their biggest cheerleaders, regurgitating the message he has been given. He is totally disgusting in his continued attempts to cover their asses, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. * doesn't read or care about the daily headlines
That much I DO believe. He can't read, and he's too stupid to understand them when someone like Harriet reads them to him. How impressive.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you're going to hate on Scott McClellan ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Jesus H. Christ on a surfboard,
this trick is so skanky no working girl would do it for ANY amount of money.

Has Howie forgotten the actual press conferences that were conducted regularly by President Clinton? He answered questions; he didn't repeat the same 3 to 5 "inspirational" pap lines. And talk about a tough hide...who would dare ask Bush the things Clinton was asked, often in front of world leaders?

Howie's obviously ill, delusional, on the take or a pathological liar. Not to mention a gigantic douche bag of fakery...
How does he draw a paycheck?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. i've been watching scotty turn on the spit for a long time now and i think
that what's happened is the spit has stopped and he's facing the coals continuously. scotty's condition is a metaphor for what the whole administration is going through.

and in the midst of this non-stop distraction and pressure, who is running the country?

who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. I like the way the press just Laughs At Loud at him
Especially at the end. Catcalls and everything. The WH press corps is finally starting to show its teeth. Finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. ok, but the reporting is still pretty weak, imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Agreed but the reporting is
also in large part a result of editors and editorial policy. Once the reporter leaves the briefing room and files the story it must pass the scrutiny of those editors.

On the other hand, the briefing itself has become a story that the reporters boss in unable to influence because of C-SPAN. A NY Times editor may kill a report about Scotty not answering a question but it still gets reported elsewhere once the video is made public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. Less enmeshed? Howie, remember Ganon? How "enmeshed" was he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. what a whore kurtz is!!!
Despite extraordinary tension with reporters during the scandals that led to impeachment,

Yeah - like ONE sex scandal!! I hate it when the 'reporters' refer to Whitewater as a Clinton scandal. Whitewater is a scandal, but it is a vast-right-wing conspiracy scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Bush cares less about the daily headlines" Ah, hubris...
...ya gotta love it.

:spank:

Personally, I think that is a lie, and he HAS been reading the papers, and so he's on coke and whiskey (again).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC