Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm so sick of all the "Hillary 2008" musings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:08 PM
Original message
I'm so sick of all the "Hillary 2008" musings
from the left AND the right.

I do not want Hillary Clinton to run for president.

I have my reasons. One of them being, flame me if you will, but this country is not about to elect a female president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well at least not one who is Hillary
And I agree the democrats really don't need to "place" Hillary. I WON'T vote for her. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Simply because she is a woman? Or because her
views make her not electable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A lil from Column A
and A lil from Column B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ok. I agree with column B. But let's talk about column A...
Are you opposed to a woman getting elected president? And if so, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. no, I am not. I'm a woman. I'll all about women being "all they can be"
but the same can't be said for the country at large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ok. So you are cynical about the possibilities but
not opposed to being surprised by a woman winning the election. Good. We agree then. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. hillary
i agree. also i have never heard hillary say that she would run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. RW and their media
are the ones pushing Hillary so hard. They have their reasons for doing so - the defeat of the Democratic candidate. They already have their "trashing" playbook ready - on a cost basis, she is probably the least expensive candidate for them to face.

I am with you - Hillary is not a candidate I would like to support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Plus it helps cast doubt on the Clinton-Gore presidency-legacy
The aptly named Dick Morris is just one of the pundit's whose whole career is nothing more than bashing the Clintons. Barbara Olsen made lots of (Scaife) money writing her so-called thoughts on Bill and Hillary. Coulter build what she has as a career on bashing the Clintons. They've been creating scandals surrounding Democratic leaders for years. For some of them, they're sole purpose is to undermine the Clinton name and to cast doubt on Democrats overall. Then they use this as part of their overall Democrats are weak and ineffective rhetoric and apply it to all other Democratic leaders - from Henry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Al Gore. It's part of their overall diversionary tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. She provides way too much fodder for the RW hate machine.
She'd be a fund-raising boon for the GOP. I have no problem with her gender. I have a problem with the fact that she's damaged goods. She should stay a senator. It seems she can actually do some good there in NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I wouldn't go as far as 'damaged goods'
but I agree with the opinion. A woman president would be fine with me, just not her. I like and admire a lot of things about her but she should stay in the Senate. We need her there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
34. well said
I don't think our viable candidate has started making noise yet.
I think we need a fresh face and a different approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. you said it sister
I echo your seniments word for word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary grew up in a GOP family
she is a social conservative who sold herself as a liberal to the Dem base when she was first lady. She is no Progressive.

Plus the fundies hate her more than Saddam. They want us to run her. Forget Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. I don't have a problem with a woman running for President...

but we know that it doesn't take much these days to energize the religious right voting block, in addition to them achieving all sorts of voter suppression and fraud. I suspect that the prospect of Bill Clinton being allowed back into the White House and advising the President, together with her being a female who may not share all of their pro-life values, would really set them off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ken_g Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. No time for compromise. We need a candidate that is willing to
give voice to progressive ideals that people are concerned about. Hillary is to worried about walking the "center" line.

How can a condidate be afraid to oppose the war when 6 out of 10 americans now oppose it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. No vote from me
not based on views or on gender. I just don't think she's electable. Too polarizing. She's a love her or hate her politician, and I don't think that's the way to go for Pres. It also makes me nervous that the right wing pundits love to pump the idea of her getting the nomination. Maybe I'm just paranoid, but ... when those guys get excited I get very suspicious.

Of course, I don't have a better idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. and why aren't they covering Biden?
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 03:40 PM by Mabus
He's pretty much announced his intentions? Probably because they don't get the ratings. The Clinton name is still valuable commodity and they are going to milk it for all it is worth.

I was listening to some pundit this morning listing a bunch of Republican hopefuls and then implied that Hillary is basically the only Democrat alive. I think we have a wealth of talent and leadership to choose from, the pundits won't recognize it because it strays too far from their well-rehearsed (and well-worn) meta-narrative that Clinton stories give the RW a chance to bash both the Clintons so they can continue to try to make the Democratic party look weak to the majority of those that still trust what the MSM says.

on edit: With regards to Biden, what does a Democrat have to do to get the press's attention? Biden has pretty much said he will run. I don't think I could support him but this highlights that when a Democrat does want the spotlight that the MSM won't give it to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Biden is an asshole
he won't get my vote, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Biden's on TV every fucking Sunday
And usually on more than one network. He might as well start a Church of the Neocon DLC PNAC'ers and get a televangelism show, rather than channel hopping every week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'd gladly vote for Hillary for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Reasons:
At this point in our history, and with the current national positioning of the Democratic party, most Dems feel obliged to be rather militaristic. Hillary will be a uber hawk, because the Clintons are all about politics, and that is a political stand that she will take. That she is a women makes that absolutely assured (note: Hillary is no Boxer, a truth to power woman.)

Think about the waste in the Pentagon. Is Hillary going to go after that? Think about a campaign. Is Hillary going to go after their lies that she supported?

There are many other reasons that HIllary will not get my vote, but just think about it. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. From what I have been able to gather
from talking to friends and relatives who only get their information from the lying TV, they are the only ones who think Hillary is going to get the nomination. The TV is brainwashing them. People who really know what is going on do not want Hillary. I hope we can keep the media from nominating Hillary for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Agree CW...I like Hillary, but she will NEVER win. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. What if the gop runs a woman?
Would that change your view?

Of course, the gop running a woman ... I just cracked myself up. Excuse me.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. !
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I think that the gop will run a woman
at the bottom of the ticket. All they need to do is split the folks who base their votes on gender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. I am too CatWoman
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 06:41 PM by politicasista
I like the Clintons, but it just seems like the promotion of Hillary is overdone. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. I just don't like her
And I don't like her politics. I think her Presidential ambitions are the big stumbling block for a clear Iraq withdrawal strategy as well. The attacks on her will make the Swift Boat Vets look like the Ty-D-Bol commercials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. We don't need dynasties in the American presidency.
For that reason I oppose Hillary's run. Plus the fact that she will drag in all the fucking baggage that she and Bill left the Whitehouse with. I think that Hillary has what it takes to do a good job but I believe the Rethugs will do everything within their power to thwart her every action, especially if they retain control of the House. I also fear that Hillary will try to appeal too much to the so-called centrist (DLC) faction and will therefore be lukewarm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. no flame from me
The Repukes want us to run Hillary. That's reason enough not to for me.

Plus, frankly, I think it's ok if somebody other than a Bush or Clinton runs the country for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. What you said
If people thought the "swift boating" of Kerry was bad, just imagine what they would do to Hillary. The GOP is PRAYING for that opportunity. So it's "Hillary" 24/7 with them.

The Democratic Party needs to pick who is best for us and the country, not who the GOP (and dare I say it, DLC) wants them to pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. i don't support anybody who doesn't want out of Iraq NOW
I am a single issue voter this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Likewise
The half-a-loaf crowd that tries to downplay Iraq misses the point. If a candidate supports the Iraq War and its expansion, there is no room in the domestic budget for the programs that Dems need to support. Nothing is more important in a candidate's stands than war and peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. Oh, I would not be excited about a Hillary run either for one of the
very reasons you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
35.  A female president is electable, just not Hillary
I'm always entertained by the idiots on TV who claim that opposition to Hillary is "only about not liking a female candidate." That's crap. As an analogy, among say a dozen male candidates running for POTUS in any given election year, 11 of the 12 will be rejected by voters. Does this mean that voters are "anti-male" b/c they've rejected so many male candidates? No, it's b/c they've deemed those particular candidates to be unacceptable. Same with Hillary. Opposition to her, from what I've gleaned, has less to do with her gender and far more to do with her positions. I alone have met scores of people who would not vote for Hillary but would, for example, support Barbara Boxer, in part b/c Hillary is a DLC booster of the neocons' world war agenda and, too often these days, a corporate apple-polisher on her stands on issues like outsourcing. (Biden's even worse, rejecting that medical bills' amendment to the bankruptcy bill-- at least Hillary did support that.)

The point is that all the Hillary hoopla is ridiculously overstated and more than a little irritating. Moreover, many Hillary supporters then try to trash opponents with the same sorry straw man, when opposition stems far more from deep policy convictions and antipathy about her war support than superficial considerations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC