Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My bet? Rove gets indicted on at least two charges! Here's the thinking:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 10:34 AM
Original message
My bet? Rove gets indicted on at least two charges! Here's the thinking:
.I think that Rove may receive at least 2 indictments and others will receive at least one apiece. The numbers of leakers (original sources) and officials needed for confirmation of the story MILITATES planning. When we consider that there were 6 reported contacts or original sources (John Dean says 6; we know of two: Rove and Libby) and multiple (3-4) confirming sources, it becomes apparent what occurred. One administrative official discovered the Plame-Wilson-Niger relationship, took it to the White House Iraq Group, turned it over to Rove, who on the spot assigned tasks to different primary leakers/sources assuring no source called another source's contact (so as not to appear too eager), that no source's "pitch" was exactly the same but that their information was all given in an "off hand" manner (e.g., "Don't go too far out on this Wilson thing, I don't want you burnt").

To have 6 calls from 3 leakers is an indication of a coordinated endeavor. If there were the 6 leakers as Dean claims would make the case even more damning. But also consider the planning necessary to have enough confirming sources. Unsure of who the reporters may call to confirm, someone would have to make sure at least 2 other officials were ready and willing to confirm if called.

Therefore a master-mind would have been necessary to coordinate all these calls and confirmations (as many as 11 as was storied last week).

They would have gone to Rove immediately and he, probably in an emergency of the White House Iraq Group, assigned the roles, the stories and the stances, etc.

So he not only leaked by was the mastermind of a conspiracy to leak.

We can only hope he lead a cover-up and committed perjury as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I definitely agree - had to be a conspiracy.
Now the question is whether it was just dirty politics or a violation of law. If just dirty politics at first, the coverups and lies afterward could be obstruction of justice and perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm thinking fugly Ari was in on the deal
He resigned and would have been in position to play an active role.

Let's see, who else? Powell-- Tenet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. The real question: how many unindicted co-conspirators? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Submit to Wonkette's contest and win a prize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Current line is 50% probability for Rove indictment, 65% for Libby...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC