skip fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-18-05 10:34 AM
Original message |
My bet? Rove gets indicted on at least two charges! Here's the thinking: |
|
.I think that Rove may receive at least 2 indictments and others will receive at least one apiece. The numbers of leakers (original sources) and officials needed for confirmation of the story MILITATES planning. When we consider that there were 6 reported contacts or original sources (John Dean says 6; we know of two: Rove and Libby) and multiple (3-4) confirming sources, it becomes apparent what occurred. One administrative official discovered the Plame-Wilson-Niger relationship, took it to the White House Iraq Group, turned it over to Rove, who on the spot assigned tasks to different primary leakers/sources assuring no source called another source's contact (so as not to appear too eager), that no source's "pitch" was exactly the same but that their information was all given in an "off hand" manner (e.g., "Don't go too far out on this Wilson thing, I don't want you burnt").
To have 6 calls from 3 leakers is an indication of a coordinated endeavor. If there were the 6 leakers as Dean claims would make the case even more damning. But also consider the planning necessary to have enough confirming sources. Unsure of who the reporters may call to confirm, someone would have to make sure at least 2 other officials were ready and willing to confirm if called.
Therefore a master-mind would have been necessary to coordinate all these calls and confirmations (as many as 11 as was storied last week).
They would have gone to Rove immediately and he, probably in an emergency of the White House Iraq Group, assigned the roles, the stories and the stances, etc.
So he not only leaked by was the mastermind of a conspiracy to leak.
We can only hope he lead a cover-up and committed perjury as well.
|
LonelyLRLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-18-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I definitely agree - had to be a conspiracy. |
|
Now the question is whether it was just dirty politics or a violation of law. If just dirty politics at first, the coverups and lies afterward could be obstruction of justice and perjury.
|
Carni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-18-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm thinking fugly Ari was in on the deal |
|
He resigned and would have been in position to play an active role.
Let's see, who else? Powell-- Tenet?
|
LiberalEsto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-18-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The real question: how many unindicted co-conspirators? nt |
NYCGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-18-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Submit to Wonkette's contest and win a prize! |
Nye Bevan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-18-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Current line is 50% probability for Rove indictment, 65% for Libby... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message |