Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Buchanan: my guess is that there are multiple indictments coming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:35 AM
Original message
Pat Buchanan: my guess is that there are multiple indictments coming
October 20, 2005 | 11:52 a.m. ET

My take on Plamegate (Pat Buchanan)

During Watergate, a good friend went to prison for saying twice before a grand jury, "I can't recall." That was about a picayune matter compared to Judy Miller's "I can't recall" to the question, "Who gave you this name, 'Valerie Flame'?"

So, my guess is that there are multiple indictments coming, for lying to investigators, perjury, obstruction of justice, and disclosure of national security secrets for political purposes. And maybe conspiracy.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9601200/#051019a


He just posted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. UH_OH!!!!!!!!!!!
To hear what they are saying in the White House, click on this link: (requires Real Audio) http://www.toontracker.com/nutty/uhoh.ram

But LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE!!! The Bush Legacy was to be that he would be a UNITER, NOT A DIVIDER. When the full extent of the disgraceful behavior of this administration is laid bare, the country will be united, and standing at the gates of the White House with torches and pitchforks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. "and disclosure of national security secrets for political purposes"
:woohoo:

That is the BIG one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope he's right.
He's been there before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamarin Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. He thinks the Iraq war is going well?
I wonder if that was a typo and should have read *not going well* instead of *now going well*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnmoderatedem Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I think that's the case

Buchanan has always been critical of the war, and has been very consistent in that regard.

Plus there's no reason to believe the war is going well now at all.

I think it's a typo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Revolution Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. "But if lying us into war is a crime..."
"But if lying us into war is a crime, we would have to have a second look at that FDR memorial on the trail to Haynes Point.)"

What the hell is he talking about here? Does he think the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor wasn't real? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Some think FDR LIHOP'd Pearl Harbor
... as a reason to get into WWII. We had no justification prior to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bballny Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fitzgerald's background is
the son of a doorman in NY. He was a doorman during the summers. He probably doesn't really like abuse of power by privilege. Being a doorman let him know which of the elites were honest and nice and respected him. It probably also showed him the bad side of these people and the ones who looked down their nose and him. I suspect he thinks this clan is the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pat has some real interesting speculation here "Big Case" & AIPAC overlap
<snip>

My own sense, from hearing and reading about Fitzgerald is that he may be going after much larger game, that he may have what Bob Bennett calls a "big case," that he may be going after the White House and WHIG for fabricating the case for war, that he is roaming afield, looking into who forged the Niger documents and passed them on to U.S. intelligence and whether the case for war was shot through with deceit and lies. (But if lying us into war is a crime, we would have to have a second look at that FDR memorial on the trail to Haynes Point.)

An interesting question is whether Fitzgerald is now working with McNulty, who got Larry Franklin to plead and is now going after AIPAC and the Israelis and has the fruits of five years of FBI investigations going back into the 1990s. Are the two Irish prosecutors collaborating?

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm begining to lose hope.
Why haven't they been handed down yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Maybe the GJ
hasn't decided yet. Or maybe the GJ hasn't decided yet on ALL the would-be indictments. Such decisions are up to them, not Fitz. They have to present Fitz with a "true bill" in order for an indictment to happen. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC