Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do we have a '72-hour Plan' like the GOP? If not, we need one.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:48 PM
Original message
Do we have a '72-hour Plan' like the GOP? If not, we need one.
1. Increasing person-to-person contacts. The Republicans’ grassroots development plan was detailed and aggressive in 2002. One team leader was recruited and trained for every 50 targeted voters. These team leaders were given monthly training, specific responsibilities, and a clear time line. The results were impressive: The RNC reports that 130,272 volunteers enlisted and that these volunteers made 12,604,410 phone calls and knocked on 8,405,119 doors. College campus recruiting—an area of particular concern—drew in 22,151 College Republicans.

2. Registering new voters. The registration outreach program was driven by detailed analyses of census block characteristics. Residents in neighborhoods deemed “likely Republican” were contacted using booths, door-to-door approaches, and mail. The goal was to register 10 percent of the total universe of unregistered Republicans. The preliminary data indicate that the registration efforts were successful (although the Democrats often matched or even exceeded the GOP’s registration increases).

3. Growing the party. The 72-hour plan targeted groups with which the GOP has recently underperformed: women, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asian Americans. The details are unclear, but we do know that the RNC and state parties attempted to identify team leaders in minority communities and to identify conservative members of these groups based on voter lists provided by gun, religious conservative, home school, and sportsmen’s organizations. We also know that they communicated group-specific messages via direct mail and paid advertising in newsletters and on radio stations.

4. Increasing coalition activity. The coalition program looked to identify prominent individuals with credibility within a specific coalition or formal leaders of coalition groups. The coalitional groups of particular interest include the right-to-life associations, family policy councils, home school associations, sportsman alliance groups, veterans’ groups, small business associations, farm bureaus, chambers of commerce, and anti-tax groups. Party personnel were charged with hosting regular conference calls with key leaders to invest them in Republican efforts and to motivate them on issues they care about. Events, in particular, were targeted—Republican representatives were present at every gun show, state fair, Veterans of Foreign Wars convention, Christian music festival, business expo, anti-tax rally, and fish fry they could find.

5. Improving voter identification and message targeting. Ultimately, much of the coalition work was designed to obtain lists of voters associated with the above groups. These lists—essential to the RNC’s voter identification and message targeting—added to the size and scope of the voter list; identified favorable, unfavorable, and undecided voters; targeted efforts; saved valuable campaign time and resources; and improved existing voter lists by adding new and valuable information.

After collecting and augmenting voter lists, the Republicans engaged in “micro-targeting”—that is, supplementing voter identification calls with polling information and then tailoring mail and phone calls to the interests and concerns of specific voters. This is not to say that each targeted voter received a personalized message. Rather, a range of messages, matched to the appropriate voters in a state or district, was devised to cover all important issues and concerns.

6. Enhancing early and absentee voting programs. Assuming that convenience voting reduces vote loss arising out of uncontrollable election day circumstances, state parties were encouraged to gather information from state secretaries of state and to create schedules to allow for voting deadlines. Mail and phone contacts were designed to provide absentee ballot request forms and information on precinct locations and deadlines.

7. Planning for the final 72 hours of the campaign. Fittingly, the 72-hour plan demanded that state, county, and precinct representatives have detailed and aggressive plans for the last 72 hours of the campaign. The RNC asked block workers to consult with activists on collecting information and creating a calendar of events, training, scheduling, time commitments, and personnel.

After conducting tests on special elections in 2001, the 72-hour plan was implemented as part of the 2002 midterm elections. These efforts resulted in more than 130,000 volunteers, each of whom worked one week. These volunteers were dispersed over 39 states, which presumably gave the Republicans an army of workers to turn out election day votes.

In raw numbers, the results also appear to have been positive. In 2000 the Democrats enjoyed a 3-point party identification advantage among voters; in 2002 the Republicans had a 4-point edge. Similarly, on average, in Senate and gubernatorial races, the GOP candidates exceeded pre-election poll forecasts by 3.2 points (+2.9 in the Senate, +3.4 in gubernatorial races). Religious conservatives went from 14 percent of the 2000 electorate to 18 percent of the 2002 electorate, whereas union members fell from 26 percent in 2000 to 21 percent in 2002.

Both the Republicans and the news media believe that the GOP is on the right track. Consider the assessment of the Washington Post: “Republicans have spent more than $1 million trying to correct the problem . In the process, they rediscovered an elemental truth about political organizing: Volunteers and personal contact count more than high-tech weapons and even television advertising. Republicans say they mistakenly believed that ‘GOTV’ meant ‘get on television,’ not ‘get out the vote.’”

http://www.hooverdigest.org/044/shaw.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Self Deleted.
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 06:54 PM by brainshrub
Self Deleted. Silly post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Who lost? Last time I checked they controlled every branch...
of the federal Gov't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. 8. Check with Diebold to be sure the fix is in
A fundamental tenet of the Republican Culture of Corruption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. We need "Operation Barber Shop"
Barber shops and beauty parlors should be our contact point for communicating throughout the year and registering new voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thats actually not that bad of an idea.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I did all my GOTV for Kerry in low income areas and barber shops
always allowed me to hang my homemade flyers that mocked Bush. When I returned weeks later with new flyers, they were still up

Some examples:

http://bushcheated04.com/flyers.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. keeping this kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think we should start three months out, with a plan to GOTV
with as many people as possible. We should focus on younger voters. Most older folks vote anyway. But the passion for change is with the young. Our future is with the young. If we could start a nationwide campaign to get young people motivated to register about 3 months out, we could surprise the nation on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What do you think that 76K registered DUer's is????
It is faster; better equipped; better managed(thanks mods); than anything the freepers have. Just remember your responsibility to you fellow DUer's, after all, we all have a civic responsibility to our fellow citizens.

Phone the congress critters; phone the state legislative critters; phone city hall critters. And above all PHONE: PHONE: PHONE everyone you know....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC