Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Judy Miller be indicted for her "forgetfulness"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Logiola Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:32 AM
Original message
Can Judy Miller be indicted for her "forgetfulness"
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 11:33 AM by Logiola
http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1020nj1.htm

would be funny if she was let out of jail to testify and then gets indicted for perjury
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope so. I don't trust her
she is lying her head off. Smug bitch,. She is hiding something and I hope that she gets indited for lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh yes, that would be grand!
She is not a role model of morality ... to say the least. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. ask l'il kim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't she say in last Sunday's NYT piece
that she was told by Fitzgerald that she was not a target, just a witness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Nope. Her lawyer said that she no longer had to worry about
contempt-of-court charges for not testifying. Doesn't mean she can't be indicted for perjury. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GayCanuck Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. The question is
who else is she protecting that her employer doesn't her to reveal????????? maybe cheney himself?, the chimp?, Wilson???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emrenz Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. She's smitten, I think.
I think she's caught up in her own celebrity. Every time there's a camera on her she's beaming. I think she's loving her moment in the spotlight and I'm sure I smell a book deal. I don't know what to believe about her and I'm sure she'll suggest you read her book if you want to learn more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Good. The ignominy will hurt just that much more.
The ultimate punishment for a narcissist is to be disgraced and ignored. This is already happening: she sinned against the soul of journalism by being a deliberate propagandist to fulfill her personal need to risk world destruction to buttress Israel, and she will be even more reviled as time goes on. The only interest the outside world will have in her is for statements to defend herself, and she'll wait by the cobweb covered phone.

What she's done is heinous, and she did it in the most amateurish and petulant way. Her downfall is one of juvenile lying in various attempts to cover her tracks as she betrayed the very definition of her profession. As a vain and posturing egotist, the shots she sustains will pang her greatly, but she'll still skate from the recriminations and humiliation she truly deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Personally..
.... I'd love to see a bunch of "journalists" indicted. There ought to be consequences for telling lie after lie after lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logiola Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. i remember right before she went to jail..
she said something along the lines of there are very powerful people she has to worry about.. anyone remember this? the quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Don't know, but here is some interesting speculation:
<snip>
The Israeli penetration of our national security has been put in the spotlight, lately, by the indictment – and guilty plea – of former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin on charges of spying for Israel. During his tenure as the Pentagon's top Iran specialist, when he worked for Doug Feith, Franklin was caught red-handed funneling highly classified information to Steve Rosen, AIPAC's chief lobbyist, and Keith Weissman, AIPAC's top foreign policy analyst, who then passed the stolen secrets on to the Israeli embassy. The interconnectedness of the investigation into AIPAC's treason with Fitzgerald's probe is underscored by the following passage from Franklin's indictment:

"On or about June 3, 2003, Franklin met with FO-3 at the POAC , and the discussion centered on a specific person, not in the United Status government, and her thoughts concerning the nuclear program of the Middle Eastern country and, separately, certain charity, efforts in Foreign Nation A."

If Franklin and his Israeli handler – a nuclear weapons specialist – were talking about a woman whose "thoughts concerning the nuclear program" of a certain "Middle Eastern country" had some significance, then surely Judith Miller is a likely candidate. When we add in the business about "certain charity efforts in Foreign Nation A," the identification becomes even more credible: "Foreign Nation A" is Israel, the "charity efforts" consist of work on behalf of the Iraqi Jewish Archive, a joint project undertaken by Miller, Harold Rhode (Franklin's associate – and fellow suspect – in Feith's policy shop), and Ahmed Chalabi. It might be said that these efforts on behalf of the Archive are not taking place "in Israel," as the wording of the indictment puts it, but the ultimate location of the archives is uncertain, and surely Israel is one very possible destination. In any case, it can safely be said that this is a project undertaken on Israel's behalf.

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7717
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. No, her statement to the court before the judge sentenced her to jail
had bits of it regarding the first amendment and the power of the gov't taken out of context in a CBS article. And then some folks here ran with it, erroneously claiming that Miller said was "scared" and frightened for her own safety from the gov't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes2000 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. An experienced attorney just commented about this
He speculated that Fitz would be unlikely to prosecute her in part because he needs her testimony against bigger fish.

I don't remember the exact article but it made some sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Maybe, maybe not
but she should be fired!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC