Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers:Nonpartisan GAO Confirms Security Flaws in Voting Machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:28 PM
Original message
Conyers:Nonpartisan GAO Confirms Security Flaws in Voting Machines
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 01:09 PM by hiley
Nonpartisan GAO Confirms Security Flaws in Voting Machines
by Congressman John Conyers,Jr.

Cross-posted at www.DailyKos.com and www.BlackProf.com


The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report:
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20051021122225-53143.pdf
today I requested with other Members Of Congress. In sum, the GAO found that "some of concerns about electronic voting machines have been realized and have caused problems with recent elections, resulting in the loss and miscount of votes." GAO found that these concerns "merit the focused attention of federal state and local authorities responsible for election administration."

What does this mean? Much has been made about this issue during the 2004 Ohio election debacle here and elsewhere, however, this is the first time Congress' investigatory arm has weighed in on the problems with our voting machines. The GAO studied the work of others and ultimately put their stamp of approval on it. That lends important credibility to the cause of election reform generally, and more specifically to requiring that every machine have a voter verified paper ballot that is used in election days audits and, if discrepancies are found in those audits, becomes the official record for the election.

There have been discussions and debates about whether this or that election was "hacked." I would like to suggest putting that discussion aside for the moment (or longer -- I understand some such discussions can result in a ban from this blog community). In this context, we should focus on what we all agree on, and what the GAO found: these machines have substantial problems. To me, in addition to being an issue that goes to the heart of our democracy, this is a consumer protection issue. There are certainly voting machine manufacturers who produce a good product. But by and large, when it comes to a voting machine, the average voter is getting a lemon -- the Ford Pinto of voting technology. We must demand better.

More specifics about what GAO found: Serious problems were identified regarding the security control system, access controls, hardware controls, and the voter-verified paper audit trail system. Among the security shortcomings identified by GAO:



Some electronic voting systems did not encrypt cast ballots or system audit logs, thus making it possible to alter them without detection.


It is easy to alter a file defining how a ballot appears, making it possible for someone to vote for one candidate and actually be recorded as voting for an entirely different candidate.


Falsifying election results without leaving any evidence of such an action by using altered memory cards.


Access to the voting network was easily compromised because not all digital recording electronic voting systems (DREs) had supervisory functions password-protected, so access to one machine provided access to the whole network.


Supervisory across to the voting network was also compromised by repeated use of the same user IDs combined with easily guessed passwords.


The locks protecting access to the system were easily picked and keys were simple to copy.


One DRE model was shown to have been networked in such a rudimentary fashion that a power failure on one machine would cause the entire network to fail.


GAO identified further problems with the security protocols and background screening practices for vendor personnel.


The suggestions made by GAO to ensure the security of machines barely scratch the surface of the problems what is needed to improve the national voting systems standards. Their report divulges that, despite the many official assurances that the problems of the past elections were isolated and few, the election system is indeed riddled with problems and flaws.

The bottom line is until we make a serious commitment to address the significant security and controls concerns we have regarding our voting machines, American citizens have no reason to have complete confidence in our democracy.


http://www.conyersblog.us/

Edit to add link to Conyers' DU Group
All of his blog postings are there
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=340
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dalloway Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank god for
Rep Conyers! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. added the link to report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sure they'll get on that right away, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. they are not flaws, they are "features"
*evil genius laugh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. lolz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. What would we do without John Conyers?
He is one of a very few people fighting for this issue. And I'm sure he does so at risk to his life. *THAT* is a hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Beating around the Bush
So they recognize all the particular symptoms of a disease without comparing to, say, Venezuela, which fairly handily went a long way to simply addressing them. So we are between a fraud capable system and the unwillingness and inability to responsibly use electronic aids. The main problem is not therefore the system but the crooks who keep pushing this garbage into our system with malice aforethought on a strictly partisan basis. And we do mean to identify the GOP despite the handful of complaints about Dem "advantages" which only serves to cloud and cripple the obvious reform.

The solution would be, in any event, to scrap all the diverse incompetent and fraud capable systems in favor of paper or mail-in ballots and open source verifiable use of electronics. You can do that the easy way, nationwide with real standards for verifiable accounting or the hard way with state by state costly litigation and literally upheaval against one party rule by cheating.

None of the GAO report is probably news and they probably miss a few whoppers, but America voting bandits are not the only machines in town. They are just the ones our Bush mob strong arms their way into precincts.
The simple principles of using electronic aids are paramount yet the laundry list of horrors predominates because those principles are simply set aside with near total impunity. Secret privatized software meaning a corporate adjudication of voting and counting and records is always possible. Pentagon secret encryption considering their crossover relationship with certain corporations is likewise not trustworthy on its own merits. Lack of real world records and lack of automatic verification of the quick tallies likewise has no defense. yet the presumption still lurks in all this we must serve and tinker with such hopeless machinery, not get back to basics. All the principles were abandoned by accepting the pitch that this technology must do it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. HAVA was mis-named.
It's true name is Help Steal American Votes Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. that is
the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hiley
Thank you for picking up this task, I am pleased DU is catching on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I really miss
you paineinthearse !
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: you are a patriot with a huge heart.

love you,
hiley :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. paine! you're back!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. DU link to Bradblog link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. DU-ers worked hard to convince the GAO along with Conyers to
investigate. This is a huge step in the right direction.

Thanks to Mr. Conyers and all the DU-ers who participate in our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. So glad to hear this news. Recommended.n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. discussion going on over what the Congressman
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 01:49 PM by hiley
had to write about the bannings and so on at kos.
snip--


"On this site and elsewhere, there have been discussions and debates about whether this or that election was "hacked." I would like to suggest putting that discussion aside for the moment (or longer -- I understand some such discussions can result in a ban from this blog community)."

snip--
Read the comments:

http://dailykos.com/
http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000281.htm#comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thank you Rep. Conyers...and all who worked so hard on this. Recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Please Email GAO Report to all national and LOCAL news desks.
Make them NOTICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. Conyers is relentless Softspoken, tireless and relentless. I love him nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you Congressman Conyers!
This is moving in the right direction! :) Hat's off to everyone working this issue. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. once again I am compelled to say: Oh, how I love and adore John Conyers
I want to have a baby boy solely so I can name him John Conyers. In fact, I'd name a baby girl John Conyers.

But since neither will happen, maybe I'll just change my middle name to John Conyers.

Rep. Conyers, :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
23. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm surprised Kos would allow such postings, because, after all,
there was no election fraud in 2004. We all know that because Kos tells us this, almost all of the leading bloggers tell us this, and Mark Hertsgaard has told us this.

Naturally I'm being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kick!!! John Conyers Rocks.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC