Bush_Eats_Beef
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:45 PM
Original message |
| Fucking HARDBALL, twisting the truth AGAIN. |
|
Just now, going to commercial break, they showed a timeline of the Plame investigation.
The last item on the timeline was "President Bush says he will fire anyone who leaked Plame's name," but THEY DID NOT include Bush's "changed" pledge to fire anyone CONVICTED of a CRIME.
FUCKING MSNB-FUCKING-C.
:grr:
|
| Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Actually, that's a good thing. |
|
Obviously if it can be shown that someone leaked the name, regardless of whether that person is convicted or not, bush is obligated to fire him/them.
Does bush really want to do the two-step and say, "Hell, no, I changed my mind and now it's only if they're convicted"? I don't think so :)
|
| shoopnyc
(500 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Yea, we can let the flip flop go... |
| longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A republican strategist and... a republican strategist.
|
| AndreaCG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Why give him the rating points |
|
Whnen you know he is going to be atrocious?
Watch Olbermann instead. Maybe Anderson Cooper.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
