|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 12:58 PM Original message |
Wurmser passed Plame's name to Libby, Hadley, those close to leak investig |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hmmm.... Do I smell a conspiracy charge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Don't forget Wurmser was "on loan" from Bolton's staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. Did Plame "send" Wilson? I thought that was debunked.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. It doesn't matter who 'sent' Wilson. That's a diversion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:05 PM Original message |
Plame did not send Wilson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. She didn't suggest him, she was asked to ask him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. No, she didn't send him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. It's like all other things connected to this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. criminal conspiracy? Espionage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtbymark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Isn't there only one "executive" in the VP office????? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. That was the exact thought I had on reading that line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. So then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobaindrain (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Cheney definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemsUnited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not so sure about RawStory's White House sources. They have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. Wurmser was the secret squirrel in all this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
11. Wurmers not officially part of WHIG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Wurmser's the Forrest Gump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. There it is. AIPAC, Franklin, Plame...Wurmser is the ribbon on the present |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Another reason we need to take back the House and Senate in '06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC