Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hindsight is 20/20: WH Should Have Been Smearing Fitz Months Ago!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:23 PM
Original message
Hindsight is 20/20: WH Should Have Been Smearing Fitz Months Ago!
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 09:30 PM by IndyOp
Tonight on MSNBC, Tucker Carlson shared his true disappointment with the White House response to the CIA leak scandal.

It's not the dishonesty, or the months of stonewalling. It's that the Bush administration didn't start smearing the special prosecutor early enough:

I think politically did very much the wrong thing by saying nice things about Patrick Fitzgerald some months ago - 'he's a man of integrity,' 'he's a good guy,' 'we have complete confidence he's going do the right thing,' etc., etc. - making it now almost impossible for the White House, even on background, to attack the guy.


Brought to you by the fine folks at ThinkProgress --
Read & Watch Video

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. My guess
They thought someone wouldn't turn, but they did.

Hubris will do that to your judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And wasn't Fitz thought to be staunchly Republican early on?
He probably looked good on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oda Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. maybe just maybe
maybe just maybe the people spending money to smear realized they'd be saving money by not even attempting ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The fact that they didn't fight him
makes me a little bit paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tucker Carlson is a traitor to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow - That's an impressive piece of equipment. Whoa.... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blossomstar Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. TC is such a preppy little repug prick... he tried during Katrina
to look compasionate, but just didn't swing it. Repug puke. I am just sick of all of them. The games are over with this bunch of criminals, they are not amusing anymore. People are dying. Everyone in this country should be outraged. What a crappy statement for the little chushy prick to make... slander Fitzgerald. Sorry for the rant, just can't take much more of the these present day Repukes. My language is getting totally out of hand when discussing them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Tucker is delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC