Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coleman says Brit lawmaker, Galloway gave false testimony to congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:25 PM
Original message
Coleman says Brit lawmaker, Galloway gave false testimony to congress
link
http://famulus.msnbc.com/famulusgen/ap10-24-141958.asp?t=apnew&vts=102420051953

Senator says British lawmaker gave false testimony, will refer evidence for investigation

By FOSTER KLUG
ASSOCIATED PRESS


WASHINGTON, Oct. 24 — An anti-war British lawmaker gave false testimony to Congress when he denied receiving U.N. oil-for-food allocations from deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, a Senate investigative panel said Monday.

Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., chairman of the subcommittee, and his investigators presented evidence that they say shows British lawmaker George Galloway's political organization and his wife received nearly $600,000 from the oil allocations.

Congressional investigators said Galloway could face charges of perjury, making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding, with each charge carrying a penalty of up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

A spokesman for Galloway, Ron McKay, said in an interview from London that the lawmaker denies the accusations and if charged with perjury is willing to appear in an American court.''Put up or shut up,'' McKay said of Galloway's accusers, calling the report derogatory and defamatory.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coleman has an axe to grind here. Coleman better watch out
or he will find his ass out on the street because of his close ties to bush's stupid policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. galloway ripped coleman...
a new one when he testified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's right. He did a horrible job on that one, even that sot Hitchens
was able to mount some kind of an instant rebuke. Not that idiot Coleman! Colman comes back with this six months later. Talk about a "girly man"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. girly man. i love it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. How typical of a Repiglican
to attack an absent opponent. Norm Coleman is a weak-kneed little nancy-Repig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did this get publicized in Britain?
Coleman won't have immunity from defamation lawsuits there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I just read about it from a brit media web site.
Consider that a yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Smirking Norm has more than met his match
Shame on Galloway for trying to raise money for suffering Iraqi kids. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i love the response...
"put up or shut up"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, perjury matters NOW?
Isn't that cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Ding!
The Repub hypocrisy bell sounds again...bottoms up everyone! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sallow Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Lying to Congress is a crime?
How about Bush and his yellowcake uranium assertion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. only when it's convenient...
for the thugs.

WP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/23/AR2005102300926.html
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Tex.), appearing on the same program, said people should wait, but if there were an indictment, she hoped it would be for "a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. Probably forgeries.
Again.

Coleman is such a sucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. no proof?
figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. well, then explain yourself...
what's the circumstantial evidence? where did you here it? c'mon show me the evidence. if you can't you shouldn't even open your mouth about the subject. just because you write something we are all supposed to believe it? i don't want another bunch of bullshit, i want FACTS. put up or shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Alas, this Texan is not familiar with "Tory country-set individuals"
Perhaps you could explain in terms we yokels might understand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. Well, I knew that much....
All those years of Masterpiece Theatre have not been in vain.

POSH: Port Out, Starboard Home (Alas, that etymology is now suspect!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Refresh your memory of Galloway's comments. (video )
The video is about halfway down this page:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/05/17.html#a2978
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Guardian: Galloway rejects senate perjury claims
Galloway rejects senate perjury claims

Staff and agencies
Tuesday October 25, 2005



George Galloway addresses the US senate subcommittee for homeland security and governmental affairs in Washington. Photograph: Dennis Cook/AP



A furious George Galloway today challenged US senators to charge him with perjury over claims that he solicited money from Saddam Hussein's oil-for-food programme and lied about it under oath.
The US Senate inquiry into the Bethnal Green and Bow MP's alleged involvement in the saga claims to have discovered $150,000 (£85,000) in Iraqi oil money in his estranged wife's bank account.

Its chairman, the Republican senator Norm Coleman, says this means Mr Galloway lied under oath when giving evidence to the senate permanent sub-committee on investigations on May 17, when he offered a passionate defence against similar claims.

Today Mr Galloway repeated denials that he had ever received any oil cash, and told Mr Coleman to "put up or shut up" by either bringing a prosecution or dropping the allegations. The Respect MP accused Mr Coleman of orchestrating a "sneak revenge attack" motivated by a desire to avenge his "humiliation" at the hearing in May.


snip


http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1600268,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. coleman was humiliated...
and it took him six months to come up with this attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. I suggest a face to face meeting between the two....
Galloway would rip him a new one ... literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. we think alike...
check post # 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. Poor Normie. Gonna have to get his head glued back on..again
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I Don't Think coleman Wants To Fuck With Galloway (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
31. Just a distraction
to take some of the attention away from Plamegate.

They had the exact same evidence last time. Watch this story fizzle out, just like it did when Galloway stole the limelight last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. maybe not n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
33. Norm Coleman, Tuna Sandwich EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. Norm Coleman is weak and not so smart.
His words and charges cannot stand before George Galloway. Coleman is as insipid as FAUX News, and both are a big embarrassment to this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. he could be...
santorum's brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. ....he ain't that smart, maybe second cousin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. ricky ain't so bright either...
finished last in his law school class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
36. How can Coleman get Galloway, a Britisher, prosecuted using U.S.
penalties? I say 'bring it on, Normie'. Let's get this accusation in the courts in Britain or here so you shut up. You are just being used by losers. Let's see what you and the losers have got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC