Montauk6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:40 PM
Original message |
Anyone here bracing themselves for an anticlimactic Fitzmas? |
|
I guess the only thing is to hope like mad that the only gift under the tree won't be the equivalent of that lousy clip-on tie and socks set.
After the 9/11 commission fiasco, I'm just sayin'...
|
Roon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We have been burned so many times.
|
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm trying hard not to get my hopes up |
|
but the thought of a jail cell slamming behind some of these administration dirt bags is just so nice.
|
Montauk6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:44 PM
Original message |
|
Community Service
2 more words
Plea bargain
2 MORE words
Time served
|
MadisonProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. We've been burned every time before - why should this be different? |
bluethruandthru
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I hate to be pessimistic.. |
|
but, every time I get excited about Fitzmas...this bad feeling sneaks up on me and I imagine no indictments and the repugs laughing, and laughing, and laughing....UGH!
|
Search Party
(570 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. No need to brace, I fully expect to be let down |
|
after all, this is Bushworld, you know, black is white, up is down, etc.
|
Tamyrlin79
(944 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Expecting the worse, here, hoping for the best. |
|
I expect no indictments. That way, if there are any, it will all be pleasantly surprising. However, expecting no indictments is less than my rational mind believes is likely. I DO think that somebody will get indicted. It is how many and how high up the food chain it goes that's iffy for me.
|
s-cubed
(860 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Since I want the whole lot taken down, starting with *, cheney, and |
|
leeza, I know I'm going to be disappointed.
|
casual hex
(109 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The last thing Bush wants right now is arrest mugshots of Rove all across the media. Plus he knows he's screwed without Rove. So you can be certain that behind the scenes right now some furious plotting is taking place.
One thing we've learned is that these people are capable of anything. What's to stop them getting to Fitz and in no uncertain terms letting him know that the best decision for his health would be a no indictments decision? Does anyone doubt they would do this?
|
Chi-Town Exile
(546 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I am, I'm afraid it will be a lot less than expected and the MSM |
|
will treat it as a major victory that there were so few indictments.
You know how they spin ... if there aren't Brazillions of indictments they will say, "Nothing to see here, move along!" Now, let's talk about another missing white woman!"
|
Burning Water
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
If there are only a few indictments for obstruction of justice, or perjury, then Bushco HAS won a major victory. And if it looks like the charges are mostly technicalities such as minor inconsistencies rather than deliberate lying, somebody's credibility will take a major PR hit, and it won't be the administration's.
These bastards have been very good at making everything we do to expose them as the lying hypocrites and murderers that they are backfire on us.
|
LoKnLoD
(923 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
counts rumors are true. I bet it is just Libby and Rover for perjury. Got my fingers crossed though.
|
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
12. ANYTHING at all will be devastating for bushco. ANYTHING. i expect |
bluedawg12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
13. yup, I think this may come to naught |
|
even if it does shrubco is old news the neocons still remain.
|
1932
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
14. If I were a Republican, I would want Dems to have high expectations for |
|
Fitzmas so that there is a lot of room to feel defeated and disappointed.
If you believed that only one or two guys would be indicted for obstruction of justice (which, if they were in the Clinton administration, you would have argued was a hanging offense for the man at the top), the way to make it seem like no big thing would be to make it feel like Rove and Cheney and Bush were all going to get indicted.
|
Chi-Town Exile
(546 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Good point ... and I'm worried we're being played once again ... nt |
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
16. If there is only one indictment, I'll be happy. A stain is a stain... |
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Am I expecting indictments? Yes. |
|
Am I expecting 22 indictments? No.
|
liberalitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
18. As I have said before.... there will be no indictments. |
|
Unless bill clinton is indicted
|
Ellen Forradalom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I'm expecting nothing |
|
and will be pleasantly surprised if anything happens.
This Fitzmas business is totally out of control.
|
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I tried purposefully to stay away from giddy Fitz posts, so I could keep even perspective.
Last year's election taught me to not count chickens before they hatch.
|
A Brand New World
(803 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. I feel the same. I was so sure last November that Kerry would |
|
win (I know he did really) that I was absolutely crushed and devastated. I want to get excited about Fitzmas but I don't want to be crushed and devastated again if and when the Bush Crime Mafia win again.
|
hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Not bracing for, sorta resigned to. |
|
And am amazed by the folks who insist that tomorrow the world will stop turning and the BFEE will crumble like Dracula in sunlight.
We can wish, but to hang our hats on it ?? Ain't wise, IMHO.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message |