Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can we get Dems to run on passing Jefferson & Madison's 11th Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:42 PM
Original message
How can we get Dems to run on passing Jefferson & Madison's 11th Amendment
Edited on Tue Oct-25-05 05:49 PM by Quixote1818
This essay was posted several days ago and it's been stuck in my brain ever since. I know this is an incredible long shot but at the very least the public deserves to be educated about the 11th Amendment that never became law.

How can we get the Dem's in Congress to run on a promise to put through Jefferson and Madison's 11th Amendment? Seems to me this would be a popular issue to run on even if every corporation in the country tries to defeat it. I sent this essay to a Republican friend and he agreed with it 100%. In fact her is his letter to me:

"Thanks for the article. The author is right on the money. This is very strange a conservative like my self agreeing with a liberal thinker but logic is truth and truth is essential for humans to solve problems. I hope you are safe and well. I will write more later thanks for remembering your conservative friend."

This is not a Democratic issue but one that would cross party lines. Democrats need to use this issue like Republicans used the "Contract on America back in 94".


Jefferson Was Right
by Mike Byron
Most Americans don't know it but Thomas Jefferson, along with James Madison worked assiduously to have an 11th Amendment included into our nation's original Bill of Rights. This proposed Amendment would have prohibited "monopolies in commerce." The amendment would have made it illegal for corporations to own other corporations, or to give money to politicians, or to otherwise try to influence elections. Corporations would be chartered by the states for the primary purpose of "serving the public good." Corporations would possess the legal status not of natural persons but rather of "artificial persons." This means that they would have only those legal attributes which the state saw fit to grant to them. They would NOT; and indeed could NOT possess the same bundle of rights which actual flesh and blood persons enjoy. Under this proposed amendment neither the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, nor any provision of that document would protect the artificial entities known of as corporations.


Jefferson worried about the growing influence of corporate power until his dying day in 1826.
Jefferson and Madison were so insistent upon this amendment because the American Revolution was in substantial degree a revolt against the domination of colonial economic and political life by the greatest multinational corporation of its age: the British East India Company. After all who do you think owned the tea which Sam Adams and friends dumped overboard in Boston Harbor? Who was responsible for the taxes on commodities and restrictions on trade by the American colonists? It was the British East India Company, of course. In the end the amendment was not adopted because a majority in the first Congress believed that already existing state laws governing corporations were adequate for constraining corporate power. Jefferson worried about the growing influence of corporate power until his dying day in 1826. Even the more conservative founder John Adams came to harbor deep misgivings about unchecked corporate power.

A few years after Jefferson's unsuccessful attempt to incorporate this amendment into the Bill of Rights, the fourth Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, John Marshall, unilaterally asserted the Court's right to judicial review in the seminal case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In practice this meant that the Supreme Court would have sole and unchecked power to determine what the Constitution meant. Jefferson was aghast. His fear lay in the knowledge that an unelected branch of government, one which is not subject to the will of the citizens, and is effectively immune from check by the two elected branches of government (Only one Supreme Court Justice has ever been impeached - none have ever been convicted and removed) was now solely responsible for determining the meaning of the Constitution. The meaning of the Constitution, and hence the very nature of our political system, was now in the hands of an un-elected and effectively uncontrollable body. "The Constitution has become a thing of wax to be molded as the Court sees fit" Jefferson lamented.

In 1886 Jefferson's twin Constitutional nightmares collided in a train wreck which has effectively derailed true democracy in this nation and indeed across the globe as other nations have either copied our unfortunate example, or have fallen under the dominion of our multinational corporations - or both.. The precipitating event was the case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad. This case is cited to the present day as having conferred the status of "natural" as opposed to "artificial" personhood upon American corporations. In fact the Supreme Court declined to rule on the issue. J.C. Bancroft Davis, the Clerk of the Court, an attorney, who curiously was also a former railroad company PRESIDENT, used his position to simply write this conclusion into the head notes which summarized the case. Ever since this fateful event; this sleight-of-hand rewriting of the Constitution, corporations have had the status of "actual" persons whose rights are fully protected by the Constitution. It was a coup against democracy which succeeded because there were no real external checks and balances on the Court, and because the Court itself chose not to act to repudiate Davis' rewriting of the Constitution. The thing stood. Precedent was established. Jefferson's "thing of wax" nightmare had come to pass.

Continued at:

http://www.byronforcongress.org/essays/jefferson_was_right.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. What was the text of the amendment?
Your link doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I fixed the link
Let me see if I can find the actual text.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not having any luck. I sent an e-mail to the author
This article by Thom Hartman touches on it as well: http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0101-07.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansberrym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. a link to Jefferson's proposals concerning monopolies


http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff0950.htm

I couldn't find anything about corporations, but his statements supporting freedom of commerce and against monopolies would seem to support the article.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. interesting
I need to read more on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great Idea...Link?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. sorry, here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC