Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New talking point. "No Underlying crime"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:36 PM
Original message
New talking point. "No Underlying crime"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lou Dobbs, you total asshat!
He just handed the Repukes that crap on a silver effing platter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is gonna be a whole lotta hat eatin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't that the Clinton Defense ?

how ironic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes. It was.
And many considered it a sound defense a couple of terms ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. He bemoans it is distracting from the serious problems this country is in
Whose fault does he think it is that this investigation has dragged on so long and is a terrible distraction? It is directly Bush and Cheney's and their chief staffers' fault with the help of Judy Miller who did her best to stall and cover up their misdeeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. true, but Gergen also said........
.......that Clinton was impeached for no underlying crime!!

If you can impeach a President who had done nothing wrong except lying to a jury, then Rove and Libby are still in the same boat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Then what pray tell do they keep lying about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's really about this. Print it, prove it and don't deny it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Great resource! of course that was a rhetorical question, but thanks
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 06:34 PM by Gonnabuymeagun
I wish my printer worked.

On edit: does it include statements prior to the war on how Iraq was NOT a threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Save to HD
and print when you can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. yeah, i mean come on... what's a little treason between friends?
happens all the time! in this administration, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. another thing about Dobbs........
....he never has liked Fitzgerald since Judy Miller was in jail due to his investigation.

I remember every night at the end of his show he would say Judy Miller has been in jail x number of days. I think he really had a lot of problems with jailing journalists and I know he doesn't have a good opinion of Fitzgerald just for that reason. So maybe that's what prompted his 'we have more important things to discuss' comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're confused. The blow job had no underlying crime, unless
you consider Monica under the desk "underlying". Poor repugs; they get confused so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. another talking point
heard from a couple blatherheads: "...indictments shouldn't happen because it distracts pResident during time of war...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. If the president is focusing his attention on the war
then he is doing a piss poor job and we stand to gain by having him distracted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sleeper Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. No Underlying Crime, eh ?
Conspiracy to invade a sovereign nation.

Conspiracy to loot the treasury.


Oh, yeah...I think a bunch of dead and horribly maimed people figure
into this somehow too......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. There was an agent undercover.... now she's not.
Crime committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC