Step right up and vote in this AOSmell poll!

[ObaMania]

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20051027100709990032&ncid=NWS00010000000001

[BattyDem]

1. Hmmm ...

Almost 370,000 people responded to the question "Did you vote for Bush in the 2004 election?"

54% said No
41% said Yes
5% didn't vote

I know it's not scientific or anything, but I find those results to be very interesting.


On edit:

From the comments section at the bottom of the page:

"I voted for him twice and would again. Considering the alternatives, it's a no-brainer. The economy is roaring, jobs are plentiful."
-- Posted by jsbedford on the Daily Pulse blog

What planet does this guy live on? :wtf:

[madrchsod]

2. i agree ,

and you know someone is watching these polls

[FtWayneBlue]

3. done . . .Hey, does that mean Bush didn't really WIN the election,

But he actually STOLE it, like so many have been saying all along!?!!??!!

Did you vote for President Bush in the 2004 election?
No 54%
Yes 41%
I didn't vote 5%
Total Votes: 373,618

If a new election were held today, who would you vote for?
A Democrat 57%
Bush 33%
Neither 10%
Total Votes: 393,263

[ObaMania]

4. IMO, yes.

.. and AOL proves it even more because their customers are generally Conservative.

[FtWayneBlue]

6. taking another look at the numbers, it looks like about 20,000

votes were missing from the first question. Either (a) the % is even worse that is stated, or (b) there are a lot of Bush voters who responded to the second part of the poll but were ashamed to 'fess up in the first part. Even with the 20K, tho, the numbers still indicate Kerry won the general election, and most likely the electoral vote as well.

[texpatriot2004]

5. ...the goblins will get ya if ya don't watch out. Little Orphan Annie

and the goblins will get ya Georgie...