cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:35 AM
Original message |
Well All Righty Then..... |
|
So far we've only lost 2,000 people in Iraq, while we lost 3,000 in the WTC. Therefore, we need to stay in Iraq until we lose at least 3,000 so it will all be even and tidy. :sarcasm:
The fact that Iraq wasn't involved with WTC apparently doesn't exist. I keep wondering what these people use for brains.
|
TallahasseeGrannie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Well you could extrapolate ever farther than that |
|
How many have THEY lost? See, we can meet that number and still have a .50 season, you know??
We've got a LONG way to go.
For a freaking pile of sand in the desert and people who hate our guts.
|
cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
We just created a new Islamic theocratic state and Iran thanks us. :eyes: We could see it coming. Why are they so stupid? (sigh)
|
TallahasseeGrannie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I am no expert in foreign events. But even I could tell you that if you create instability in that part of the world the guys in the robes and turbans will move in and take over and put their pictures on billboards all over town.
Geez.
|
cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |
5. We have to get rid of those WMD's that they didn't use against |
|
an invading army(USA).. Never could figure out why Saddam moved those WMD's, was he saving them for a rainy day?
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Maybe he was saving them until someone invaded his country? |
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. We're fighting them over there because the Saudis came |
|
over here.... or we're fighting the Iraqis over there because they wouldn't come over here.
|
cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. And its better to have our people die over there than to have |
|
our people die over here after they don't attack us. :crazy:
|
cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. It would be rather silly to not use everything you possess to |
|
save yourself, wouldn't you agree?
My latest theory is that he set off multiple WMDs and we never noticed due to Shock and Awe. :eyes:
|
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. One thing for certain, even if you believed Bush's lies, it should |
|
have been perfectly clear after the first few days of the war that he didn't have WMD's.. Con's don't use common sense, instead they chose to believe an even bigger lie that he moved them..
|
cornermouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Once the Bush administration proved that cons use no common |
|
sense, they tried to prove it even more by anouncing we were in Iraq now to give them democracy... I asked a neo con at work once, how damn stupid do you have to be to continue to believe this filthy administrations’ crap?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |