Is Bush* Morally Fit To Appoint Supreme Court Justices?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

[Callalily]

1. Bush is not morally fit

to make any decision, however small and insignificant.

[Quakerfriend]

2. exactly.

I'm wondering,If he is impeached, is it possible to reverse some of the ?+*&^^!! things he's already put in place?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

4. He's Itching For A Fight With This Pick...

We need to destroy this pick but we need to be smart about it...



Any suggestions...

[tavalon]

15. It's already done

Planned Parenthood, NOW and the women of America will take this one down. I promise you.

[eleonora]

3. No

I don't think you'll get any YES here

[ronatchig]

5. Morally fit to

clean crappers in Leavenwoth is as high on the meter as SIS can aspire .

[deminks]

6. I don't think he is mentally fit, either. nt

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7. We Established That In 2000...

Brain cells destroyed by alchohol and drugs do not regenerate...

[SCRUBDASHRUB]

9. Took the words right out of my mouth (and this is with all respect

to those who have mental illness, of course).

[greekspeak]

8. He isn't morally fit to run a rigged carnival game at the Crawford Fair

Really.

[Skittles]

10. I can guarantee you he did not make this decison

I can also guarantee you that whoever did is morally unfit

[tavalon]

16. Rove

And yes, he is quite morally unfit.

[sam sarrha]

11. he isnt even mentally fit..90 IQ burnt out wet brain alcoholic drug addict

[Crankie Avalon]

12. No, he's obviously not fit for that. But I think he'd be pretty good at...

...being one of those guys who catches "the healed" for Benny Hinn.

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

13. Well duh.

Seriously, aren't we past this point?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

14. It's A Push Poll

eom

[Catchawave]

17. I'm more concerned about him handling

a flu PANDEMIC. Wonder which of his pharma pals will reap the profits of the money he'll be asking for from Congress ?

I mean, we can't even trust him with a bag of pretzels!:silly:

[SheilaT]

18. Truly a

dumb question. He's President, and only the President has the constitutionally granted power to appoint Supreme Court Justices.

Back when Clarence Thomas got appointed, and then confirmed despite what I thought was clear evidence he wasn't up to the job, I honestly expected he'd resign in a few years. Well, that hasn't happened, has it.

What we have to care about a lot more is the Senate takes its Advise and Consent duty seriously.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

21. I Didn't Ask If He Had The Constitutional Power But The Moral Probity?

eom

[SheilaT]

23. It's still a dumb question.

And it's one of the reasons DU is seen as being overrun by left-wing nutcases.

[Crankie Avalon]

19. OK, who voted "yes?"...

:popcorn:

[Syncronaut Seven]

22. Aparently only one freeper on the board this morning.

Must not be early risers. Too bad.

[Totally Committed]

20. Partially, the wrong question....

His moral "fitness" is only part of it. He is now, according to all the polling being done, woefully out of step, ideologically with more than a majority of Americans. He should be precluded from making any "lifetime" appointments until and unless his polls numbers reflect a majority of support from the American people.

Any appointment now refelcts a failed ideology, and a failed government. And, for those of us who disagree him, to have to live with his crony appointments for a lifetime is beyond wrong.