Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush to Senate: "Act promptly, up-or-down vote before end of this year"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:36 AM
Original message
Bush to Senate: "Act promptly, up-or-down vote before end of this year"
"I’m confident that the United States Senate will be impressed by Judge Alito’s distinguished record, his measured judicial temperament and his tremendous personal integrity. And I urge the Senate to act promptly on this important nomination so that an up-or-down vote is held before the end of this year.

Today, Judge Alito is joined by his wife, Martha, who was a law librarian when he first met her. Sam and I both know you can’t go wrong marrying a librarian."

http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/campaignforthecourt/2005/10/_bush_good_morn.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why not?
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 09:38 AM by Loonman
Senate Dems have been a bunch of fucking pussies for five years(with the exception of Byrd, Wellstone{RIP}, Kucinich), anyway, what's another couple years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Harriet Miers didn't get an up-or-down vote.
But then, she wasn't married to a librarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Exactly.
The whole up-or-down vote business has been mooted by the White House itself, which obviously does not feel that ALL of its SC nominees are deserving of that courtesy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I was watching WJ today..
.. and someone actually had the nerve to say that Bush deserves this nominee because he tried to reach out to the Dems with Miers and she was shot down. Wtf? What planet are these people living on? Just *who* was it that raised such a fuss about Miers.. oh, that's right.. the religious reich, that's who!

Of course, this is the same program that tried to spin Shrub's poll numbers by having callers state that 50% of the country hate Bush anyways, so, if you think about it, being at 30% isn't that bad anyways because it was just Conservatives who were pissed at the Miers nomination.. oh, and they also managed to state that, essentially, those against the Conservatives were somehow the "enemies" in this country.

Yay for spin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nope, "up-or-down vote" is no longer a priority
We've all seen that conservatives insist on an up-or-down vote only when it suits their purposes. Well, President Stupidhead, the Senate plans to take its own sweet time considering this nomination. See, there's that whole separation of powers thing that you and your mouthpieces were spouting about Miss Miers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. A shot across the bow to preempt the filibuster
which will without a doubt occur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. He has to appear in control of something...
He can't control the Religious Right, he can't control hurricane relief, so what's left for now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. He doesn't even have control of his own little boy
Scribing notes to his caretakers to go to the potty room does get noticed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. won't happen.....
holidays coming up...........if Democrats play their cards right this can be tied up until.Jan or Feb 06
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. That up or down vote is nothing but a joke at this point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. But... but... what about Harriet Miers?
Poor Harriet didn't get an up-or-down vote, and she didn't get it because a bunch of Republicans (who also wanted her to disclose a bunch of paperwork) didn't want her to have one. I didn't think she should have had the job either, but it seems to me that by torpedoing Miers the way they did, they can't very well demand now that this guy is entitled to get an up-or-down vote.

Did I ever mention how much I hate Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Slow down, Bush, O'Connor's still there.
Cases are not going unjudged. The Senate can and should explore this nominee thoroughly. Prepare the probe! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Doesn't want to have to work over the Holidays.
Well, they showed him who's boss. Didn't they? Thought I'd heard that the hearings will be in January. Yup, the swagger is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't understand this at all
Was Miers a big fakeout from the gitgo to make the next choice seem acceptable by comparison? I know bush is naive enough to think he could get away with this but do the people around him believe the American people are dumb enough to fall for it? OMFG, are we that dumb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bush picked Miers because:
1. He's a completely isolated idiot, and
2. He likes people who kiss his ass, and
3. He considers anybody who'll kiss his ass to be qualified for anything, and
4. Karl Rove was too busy worrying about, um, other things to straighten him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. trying to get him on there before
bushco is toast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. I already hate this guy after hearing about his opinion on spousal
notification. Shit. What a neanderthal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bullshit ...
Perma-Filabuster

No more nominees for bush, until we know the fall out of any impeachment proceedings. You know that Republicans would do the same.

This corrupt administration has run wreckless over our country, and it needs to be nuetered.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. "marrying a librarian"? I thought he "married a teacher" - wasn't that th
the bone he threw at the teachers' heads? That he "married a teacher"? Yes, she was a librarian - but the key seemed to be "I love teachers; I married one."

No, he loves fucking the teachers over a barrel. I would think that a library is too much of a socialist concept for Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. So now an up or down vote is important? It didn't seem to matter
when Miers was the nominee. What a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC