Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it too late to get O'Connor to take back her resignation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:45 AM
Original message
Is it too late to get O'Connor to take back her resignation?
You just know Sandra Day O'Connor is pissed that * picked a man to replace her on the Supreme Court. She has said publicly that he should pick a woman to replace her. (And that whole Harriet Miers flap was no doubt an insult to O'Connor, giving that Miers was completely unqualified for the role.)

Granted, it's an unlikely scenario, but is it possible she could be talked into taking back her resignation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. think it is too late now--besides, she wants to be with her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Do you think she had "help"
in her decision to resign? I think it's very obvious that someone who retires from the Supreme Court (especially a swing voter) who is in good health had a little "encouragement" to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. She has wanted to retire since 2000
due to the then poor health of her husband. He has presumedly only gotten worse in the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeppers.. She was overheard by more than a few people
at a party...saying... "She hoped Bush won so that she could retire during a republican adminsitration"...and a month or so later SHE helped create that administration by interfering in the Florida debacle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe she never really intended to resign in the first place?
Maybe this is precisely the sort of thing she wanted to put Bush through?

I know, that is a very long shot!

But it sure would be kind of funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Let's not deify her just yet...after all, her help gave us this unelected
President...she never had any thought of voting the other way in Gore v Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL! Apparently other groups are thinking along the same lines
Here's something I found on the National Organization of Women (NOW) web site:

NOW Urges O'Connor to Remain on Court

Statement of National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy

Today's withdrawal by Harriet Miers as a nominee to the Supreme Court illustrates once again the stranglehold George W. Bush's base of religious and political extremists have on his administration.

The real reason Bush's right-wing base demanded her withdrawal was the lack of an iron-clad guarantee (which they had with John Roberts) that Miers would be a solid vote to overturn longstanding precedents like Roe v. Wade and uphold abortion restrictions enacted under this administration.

Conservatives were looking for their own kind of "activist" judge and Miers did not appear to fit the bill.

<snip>

We need a proven and independent justice on the Supreme Court. Someone who will uphold our core fundamental rights and constitutional protections. Someone who will not turn back the clock on women's rights and human rights. Someone who is not beholden to any extreme faction.

http://now.org/press/10-05/10-27.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. by the way, it's the National Organizaton FOR Women, not OF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Her resignation is not the problem....
Her vote to install Bush as President caused the damage.

I hope she has many years of leisure in which she can witness the effects of her 2000 vote. I believe she is a decent enough person that she will feel regret.

Why didn't she retire in 2001, if she was so eager to be with her husband?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC