Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry, Kennedy deliver talking point on Alito - choice of a WEAKENED prez.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:14 AM
Original message
Kerry, Kennedy deliver talking point on Alito - choice of a WEAKENED prez.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 11:27 AM by blm
Both Kerry and Kennedy stressed the point about Alito that he is the choice of a president cowed by a RW base that has proven to show control over Bush.

Only a WEAKENED PRESIDENT would give in so easily to a RW base and its media machine. Bush is proving he NEEDS them and will follow their direction and is not willing to risk their wrath. He's chicken. The base looks like a jet landing strip to him now, and he's crapping his pants in fear, just like he did when he QUIT the TANG.


KERRY:
Every American should be deeply concerned that the far right wing which prevented Harriet Miers from even receiving a Senate hearing is celebrating Judge Alito’s nomination and urging the Senate to rubber stamp the swing vote on our rights and liberties. Has the right wing now forced a weakened President to nominate a divisive justice in the mold of Antonin Scalia? With civil rights, privacy rights, and mainstream American values hanging in the balance, the President’s sagging political position in his own party is no excuse to reopen wounds in America which a President should seek to repair.

“In nominating a successor to Justice O’Connor, President Bush had the power to unite the country by nominating a highly qualified woman or minority who would put the Constitution first and reflect the diversity of our country. Instead, the record must be studied, the documents must be made available, and the questions must be answered conclusively, to determine whether the president has chosen to divide the country with a nominee outside the ideological mainstream.”

KENNEDY:
Rather than selecting a nominee for the good of the nation and the court, President Bush has picked a nominee whom he hopes will stop the massive hemorrhaging of support on his right wing. This is a nomination based on weakness, not on strength.

After insisting that Harriet Miers shouldn't even get a hearing because she couldn't prove she was extreme enough, the far right has now forced the President to choose a nominee that they think has views as extreme as their own.

There are many serious questions about whether Judge Alito is a mainstream nominee fit to fill the seat of Justice O'Connor. She was able to unite and strengthen our country through her careful, non-ideological approach to the law.

Although he is clearly intelligent and experienced on the bench, that is only the beginning of our inquiry. If confirmed, Alito could very well fundamentally alter the balance of the court and push it dangerously to the right, placing at risk decades of American progress in safeguarding our fundamental rights and freedoms.

After stating that he believed in a diverse bench, President Bush took the nation a step backwards today. Apparently, he couldn't find a woman or minority or a mainstream nominee that meets the litmus tests of the right wing, and instead put forth a nominee with a troubling record on the rights and freedoms important to America's families.

The Senate will now fulfill its constitutional role and conduct thorough and fair hearings to determine Judge Alito's fitness to sit on the highest court in the land. There are few decisions as important as picking a Supreme Court Justice, and the Senate must not be rushed in considering this nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. See, I earned political capital..and now I'm going to spend it..
LMAO!! what a f#kcing joke...the wheels have been wobbling for years and now they are starting to fall off!! BushCo** will be doing really nasty things before their time is through....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Schumer should pursue this path as well.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 11:18 AM by TayTay
As well as bring all the things the RW mentioned in their opposition to Miers. We need to see the paper trail and the papers. We don't want to rush to judgment on this. All that stuff.

I definitely also think that ALL DEMS should not allow these hearings to be rushed into existence in Dec. They can wait until the first of the year.

We need all Dems to pursue this consistent argument. It's a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have to admit, that's a good line, weakened president, and it's true nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. yep. This should be used to make people SEE how weak Bush really is.
Especially after 5 years of the media selling him as a great, tough leader. No surprise that US media ranks 44th in freedom of the press index.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep. A weak, petulant little thug!
BWAHAHAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. I also like the recent push to label these picks as a push to pack...
...the court with RW "Activist Judges," with is exactly what they are.

I guess Judicial Activists are only O.K. when they agree with RW views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Happy to see them and others react that quickly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Looks like the fight is ON.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ...and with one voice! This is what the Dems need to do! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumblebee1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. POlitical capital?
Hell, Bush is now bouncing those political capital checks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. heheh....or maybe it's the coke making him bounce off those walls lately?
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 12:48 PM by blm
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. They've re-discovered the "Wimp" factor
which had been used to some decent effect against Poppy Bush.

Remember when Doonsebury strips joked about how GHW Bush was planning to put his manhood in a blind trust?

Remember Jimmy Carter referring to Poppy as being perceived as "kind of effeminate?"

heh. Who woulda thunkit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. it strikes at the heart of *'s appeal
--that he is a strong, resolute guy. The people are beginning to see that it has always been an act. This statement is great political timing, as well as being factually accurate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Can we resurrect the shoe-lifts story?
For some reason, I find it hysterically funny that a President would feel a need to wear lifts in his shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. YES...and Kennedy just used WEAKENED on a live interview on MSNBC.
I do hope the other Dems use this line to attack.

It works on almost ANY policy from George the Lesser's WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. I sincerely hope the Dems do not cave on this one.
Pick your fights? Well THIS is the fight we need to pick! I want a resounding rejection of this nominee by Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Me too. I'm hoping the message of Bush's weakness resonates
with more moderate Republicans in the Senate. I believe there are a few of them left. I suspect the playbook is designed for them as much as it is for popular opinion.

By the way, you have got to have the scariest damn signature I've ever run across. I jump every time I open one of your posts. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. LOL! Appropriate for Halloween, eh?
If I didn't know who they were, I'd think those were costumes. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. You're right. Moderates don't HAVE to knuckle under to an unpopular prez
who caves to the extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think this is a brilliant tactic.
Remember FDR's "packing the Court". Same thing, different era.

We Democrats have to reiterate this point over and over again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Like I said in another thread, when I read Kerry's statement I actually
heard the crack of the bat and the roar of the crowd as the ball sailed over the wall. (I have a vivid imagination and visualize everything, it can be a problem, but this time it was very exciting!)

Game ON my friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Both Kennedy and Kerry are on this. Kennedy just used the WEAKENED word
on an MSNBC live report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I know, but I heard the crack when I read Kerry's statement first.
Perhaps if I had read Kennedy's statement first I would've heard the crack then. :)

Either way, I think we've got ourselves a TEAM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Heh...yep...looks like a lineup of longball hitters so far.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. YES!!! Dean used the W word, too. WEAKENED.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 02:06 PM by blm
Howard Dean on the Nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court

10/31/2005 12:51:00 PM

WASHINGTON, Oct. 31 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean today issued the following statement on the nomination of Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court:

"President Bush shouldn't try to use the nomination of an extreme conservative to distract from the ethical problems his White House is facing. Three days after a top White House official was indicted, President Bush continued his troubling pattern of playing to his right-wing political base in times of political trouble. In an indication of his weakened political position, Bush has nominated Samuel Alito, a conservative activist judge, to replace Justice O'Connor, who has been a voice of moderation on the Court for a generation.

"A lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States is too important to be sacrificed on the altar of short-term political gain. President Bush's nomination of Alito is not leadership, it is capitulation.

"Alito's record suggests an activist judicial philosophy bent on rolling back the rights and freedoms that all Americans value. Alito has sought to limit the rights of women and people with disabilities in discrimination cases, demonstrated an open hostility to women's privacy rights even in basic reproductive health matters, has a record of hostility toward immigrants, and tried to immunize employers from employment discrimination cases. It is particularly troubling that President Bush would nominate a judge who would reverse American progress and make the Supreme Court look less like America on the same day that most Americans are honoring the life and legacy of Rosa Parks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC