Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Milwaukee Paper Apologizes for Accepting 'Cooked' WMD Evidence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:11 PM
Original message
Milwaukee Paper Apologizes for Accepting 'Cooked' WMD Evidence

By E&P Staff
Published: October 31, 2005 10:55 AM ET

NEW YORK The most important newspaper in its region finally apologized to readers for accepting "cooked" evidence about WMD in Iraq that helped lead to war in 2003. No, it was not The New York Times.

In a column on Sunday, O. Ricardo Pimentel, editorial page editor at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, wrote that, “Yes, regrettably on the matter of WMD, count us as among the many who were duped. We should have been more skeptical. For that lack of skepticism and the failure to include the proper caveats to the WMD claim, we apologize, though I would note that, ultimately, we didn't believe that the president's central WMD argument warranted war. Not then and especially not now.”

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001392546
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's one
What about the other media whores. I won't hold my breath waiting for teh New York Slimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually, they apologized months ago.
But the ones who really should acknowledge this are the ones who fed the lies to the media in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kudos. Gotta respect that.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did they send free copies to the six-billion people affected? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's high time every media outlet and member of Congress who bought
into this cooked intelligence apologize and undo, the extent possible, all the terrible wrong that has been inflicted on this nation and the world as a result thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Damned liberal press!
You cannot win with the far right wing. As sure as I'm sitting here, typing this, once my far right wing acquaintances see this, the first sentence out of their mouths will contain "liberal" and "press."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. and they're not so liberal, anyway
They are fairly mainstream. They carry a lot of conservative columnists. And they weren't even going to endorse a candidate in the 2004 election, but then at the last minute did endorse Kerry. We have a free alternative weekly paper here for critiques of the WH, but the Journal Sentinel is usually reluctant. Glad to see them admit this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC