Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Alito? Booman explains: Roe destroyed, Bush’s crimes buried. Petition:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:50 PM
Original message
Why Alito? Booman explains: Roe destroyed, Bush’s crimes buried. Petition:
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 04:05 PM by Nothing Without Hope
Booman in his insightful Booman Tribune blog explains the significance of Bush’s nomination of Samuel Alito for Supreme Court. It’s not only about appeasing the hard-right’s insistence on overturning Roe v. Wade, it’s about burying his own crimes.

http://www2.boomantribune.com/story/2005/10/31/135448/77

Casey at the Court


by BooMan,?Mon Oct 31st, 2005 at 01:54:48 PM EDT

(snip)

By putting Porter Goss at the CIA, Michael Chertoff at Homeland Security, John Negroponte at the NIA, Abu Gonzales at Attorney General, and attempting to put his personal lawyer on the Supreme Court, he hopes to cover up his abuse of the intelligence community, his torture policy, and his other crimes.

The nomination of Samuel Alito represents Plan B. He now proposes to overturn Casey { http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey} and Roe, and anyone who fails to support Bush through his many travails, is effectively abandoning the anti-choice movement at THE critical time.

(snip)
By replacing O'Connor with Alito, he flips the Casey case.

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=55882
Alito has argued that significant restrictions on a woman's right to choose are constitutional. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Alito argued that all of the proposed law's restrictions on a woman's right to choose -– including a spousal-notification provision struck down by the Third Circuit and, later, the Supreme Court -– were constitutional. Alito dissented in part because he would have gone even further than the rest of the court.


Versus:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050718/shapiro
It fell to O'Connor, along with fellow Reagan appointee Anthony Kennedy and George H. W. Bush appointee David Souter, to complete the unfinished business of Roe v. Wade with Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992. Their joint opinion, establishing that "the ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives," stands as a hallmark of judicial sanity, and as the Supreme Court's most firmly persuasive articulation of women's rights.



So, this is the showdown we have all feared and hoped to avoid. Alito is on the record as opposing Casey. He is not a stealth candidate. He is openly hostile to women's reproductive rights. The American people do not support overturning Roe or Casey. Arlen Specter { http://specter.senate.gov/} claims to be pro-choice. He is the only pro-choice Republican on the Judiciary Committee, but he is the Chairman. Arlen needs to know that he is the last roadblock preventing a right-wing steamroller from crushing the federal protections of a woman's right to choose.



People For the American Way has already sent out an email on Alito’s nomination:


Subject: Bush Nominates Alito for Supreme Court
Date: October 31, 2005 10:04:14 AM EST


Bush Nominates Alito for Supreme Court



The President has given in to the right wing's demand to be rewarded for his reelection, nominating Judge Samuel Alito to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court. The extremist faction that helped kill Harriet Miers' nomination has gotten what it wanted: a nominee in the mold of Thomas and Scalia. In fact, Alito has earned such a reputation for ideological activism while serving on the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that he has been nicknamed "Scalito."

On the appeals court, Alito endorsed radical restrictions on reproductive choice -- such as requiring that a woman notify her husband before obtaining an abortion -- raising serious concerns about the future of Roe v. Wade if he is confirmed. He is a leader of the radical right-wing legal movement to prevent the federal government from enforcing civil rights protections. He has claimed that the federal government cannot fully apply the Family and Medical Leave Act to state employees. He has even argued that Congress could not enact a ban on the possession of machine guns. If confirmed, Alito could be a threat to our rights and liberties for a generation or more.

President Bush wasn't willing to stand up to the far right -- now it is up to the American people and our senators to stand up for the Constitution. Sign our petition urging your senators to oppose Alito's nomination to be associate justice of the Supreme Court.

http://www.SaveTheCourt.org/StopAlito

Sign Petition to Stop Alito: http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?ID=M711983399037579520537765}

“Dear Senators,

The Senate must reject President Bush's attempt to reward right-wing special interests by nominating Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court of the United States. Alito's record as an ideological activist makes his confirmation a threat to civil rights protections, reproductive and privacy rights, environmental protections, religious liberty, and laws safeguarding workers.

I urge you to vote not to confirm Samuel Alito to a lifetime position on the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Add hour name HERE: http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?ID=M711983309037579520537765


It’s time to fight, or the GOP will succeed in their mission to destroy the impartiality of the Supreme Court just as they have in the other two branches of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick - let's keep this visible n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mestup Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Is there a vulnerable Senate seat in your state?

http://www.removerepublicans.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Alito's nomination will be discussed on Countdown/MSNBC tonight
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 05:42 PM by Nothing Without Hope
Unfortunately, Keith Olbermann will not be there, but still, there should be some good information. Apparently, Alito is notorious not only for his belief that a woman's right to make her own reproductive decisions is unconsitutional, but also for his support of gun "rights" that most would consider far beyond any justification.

The entire daily emailed Countdown Newsletter is posted here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=315x25015

Here is an excerpt on the Alito nomination:


Subject: Alito Alights Controversy
Date: October 31, 2005 12:54:15 PM EST


------------------------------------------------------
Tonight on Countdown
------------------------------------------------------

Stung by the rejection of his first choice, President Bush on Monday nominated appeals court judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court - mollifying his conservative base but angering Democrats who said Alito could divide the country over abortion and gun rights. "Judge Alito has served with distinction on that court for 15 years, and now has more prior judicial experience than any Supreme Court nominee in more than 70 years," Bush said, drawing an unspoken contrast to his first choice, Harriet Miers.

Abortion rights: in a 1992 case he supported spousal notification. Alito favors more restrictions than either the Supreme Court has allowed or retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has supported. On gun rights, Alito in 1996 was the only appeals judge to vote against upholding Congress' authority to ban fully automatic machine guns.

In the Senate, Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said lawmakers must "find out if the man replacing Miers is too radical for the American people." "President Bush would leave the Supreme Court looking less like America and more like an old boys club," Reid added, referring to the fact that Alito is neither a woman nor a minority. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9874588/

Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann broadcasts LIVE at 8 pm et, and the count is never complete without you. Join us.

Lisa Daniels in for Keith tonight.

(snip - the Newsletter goes on to cover other stories that will be on tonight's show)


Countdown airs on MSNBC live at 8 PM ET and repeats at midnight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Silverspoon Sociopath has caved in to the Radical RW.
The Radical RW has been pushing to take over Amerika for 30 years. Now they have reached the line. Will Dems be complicty once more and allow the RW Corporatists to control Amerika or will they fight for this country to remain a Representative Democratic Republic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not just Roe - Think Progress gives ALITO's awful civil rights positions:
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 06:20 PM by Nothing Without Hope
This is the kind of Bush SCOTUS nominee we feared - a total abomination intended to gut the last branch of governmetn left standing and appease the hard-right Bush base that thought Miers wasn't bugnuts-crazy enough to see their agenda through. You can bet there was behind-the-scenes vetting of Alito and that the Fristians LOVE him.

Mods - I am including all the points brought out by Think Progress in the message because they are an advocacy organization and WANT the message spread on this. This is not like a newspaper or blog that is concerned about copyright issues.

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/31/samuel-alitos-america

Samuel Alito’s America


CNN reports that “President Bush will nominate 3rd Circuit Appeals Court Judge Samuel Alito for the U.S. Supreme Court.” {http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/31/scotus.bush/index.html} Who is Samuel Alito? ThinkProgress has the facts:



ALITO WOULD OVERTURN ROE V. WADE: In his dissenting opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Alito concurred with the majority in supporting the restrictive abortion-related measures passed by the Pennsylvania legislature in the late 1980’s. Alito went further, however, saying the majority was wrong to strike down a requirement that women notify their spouses before having an abortion. The Supreme Court later rejected Alito’s view, voting to reaffirm Roe v. Wade. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=505&invol=833>

ALITO WOULD ALLOW RACE-BASED DISCRIMINATION: Alito dissented from a decision in favor of a Marriott Hotel manager who said she had been discriminated against on the basis of race. The majority explained that Alito would have protected racist employers by “immuniz an employer from the reach of Title VII if the employer’s belief that it had selected the ‘best’ candidate was the result of conscious racial bias.” http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=3rd&navby=case&no=971559p>

ALITO WOULD ALLOW DISABILITY-BASED DISCRIMINATION: In Nathanson v. Medical College of Pennsylvania, the majority said the standard for proving disability-based discrimination articulated in Alito’s dissent was so restrictive that “few if any…cases would survive summary judgment.”

ALITO WOULD STRIKE DOWN THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT: The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) “guarantees most workers up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for a loved one.” {http://www.cs.umass.edu/%7Eimmerman/play/IfBushChoseTheSupremeCourt.html} The 2003 Supreme Court ruling upholding FMLA http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=01-1368> essentially reversed a 2000 decision by Alito which found that Congress exceeded its power in passing the law. http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/3rd/003140.html>

ALITO SUPPORTS UNAUTHORIZED STRIP SEARCHES: In Doe v. Groody, Alito agued that police officers had not violated constitutional rights when they strip searched a mother and her ten-year-old daughter while carrying out a search warrant that authorized only the search of a man and his home. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/3rd/024532p.pdf>

ALITO HOSTILE TOWARD IMMIGRANTS: In two cases involving the deportation of immigrants, the majority twice noted Alito’s disregard of settled law. In Dia v. Ashcroft, the majority opinion states that Alito’s dissent “guts the statutory standard” and “ignores our precedent.” In Ki Se Lee v. Ashcroft, the majority stated Alito’s opinion contradicted “well-recognized rules of statutory construction.”



Because of its concise summary of these major issues, I've posted this Think Progress piece as a separate thead here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2206263
thread title: Not just Roe - Think Progress gives ALITO's awful civil rights positions:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nice distraction from the Fitzgerald investigation too! Just as predicted:
The Bushies are aiming to distract:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5187570
thread title (10/27): LA Times: "White House Plans to Deflect" - WH post-indictment game plans

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Done. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. ESSENTIAL to BROADEN discussion of Alito's positions BEYOND ROE:
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 08:32 PM by Nothing Without Hope
I've started a separate thread for this with documentation of his appalling civil rights positions on a variety of issues, and we need to expand this. Many sincere, honest people oppose abortion on religious or other grounds. They need to be made aware that there are many other positions taken by Alito that are fundamentally opposed to civil or even human rights.

Here's the thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2206263
thread title (10/31): Not just Roe - Think Progress gives ALITO's awful civil rights positions:

For example, here are the titles of sections of the Think Progress documentation in that thread. The list starts with reproductive rights, but goes on from there:


ALITO WOULD OVERTURN ROE V. WADE:
ALITO WOULD ALLOW RACE-BASED DISCRIMINATION:
ALITO WOULD ALLOW DISABILITY-BASED DISCRIMINATION:
ALITO WOULD STRIKE DOWN THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT:
ALITO SUPPORTS UNAUTHORIZED STRIP SEARCHES:
ALITO HOSTILE TOWARD IMMIGRANTS:


And this is just a START. We need to further organize documentation of these and other clear examples of how this man could never be an impartial SCOTUS judge - he is closely tied to Bush and he has shown clearly that he would be an activist judge who would undermine established civil rights law and promote the erosion of liberties and basic human decency in future confrontations over issues such as Patriot Act abuses, torture, and virtually every other potential horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Filibuster! Fight or Die
Those are the choices of the Dems. This battle is the singular reason I have been a Democrat for a quarter century. Either they fight now or I will realize I have been a Democrat in vain for my entire adult life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. ***TWO PETITIONS to fight Alito's confirmation: PFAW and Moveon. Links:***
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 08:55 PM by Nothing Without Hope
The link to the PFAW (People for the American Way petition) petition in the OP of the current thread

Link to MoveOn petition in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2207213
thread title (10/31): MoveOn Emergency Petition to Stop Alito! 250,000 signatures in 48 hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Direct Links to 3 Petitions - Moveon, Planned Parenthood, & PFAW
MoveOn:
http://www.moveonpac.org/stopalito

People For the American Way
http://www.savethecourt.org/alito

Planned Parenthood
http://www.ppaction.org/campaign/sc_round3_oppose

Please sign if you have not already and pass along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Excellent - thanks!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. ***Much more already available on Alito's case history at Wikipedia:***
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Alito

I suggest you go there and download links to documentation from time to time as the entry evolves. You know that the freepers will be trying to bollix it, so downloading links to key info is a way to be sure you have access to the facts.

There is a separate Wikipedia entry for his SCOTUS nomination:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Alito_Supreme_Court_nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Another related thread: "Women, we have work to do. Must oppose Alito."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2199840
thread title (10/31): WOMEN, WE HAVE WORK TO DO. MUST OPPOSE ALITO.

But as I have said above and emphasized in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2206263
thread title (10/31): Not just Roe - Think Progress gives ALITO's awful civil rights positions:
I believe it would be a major error to concentrate ONLY on Alito's stand on reproductive rights. Many people in this country sincerely and profoundly oppose abortion but would be appalled by some of Alito's other policy positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. THREE MORE ALITO THREADS from the DU Home Page:
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 11:30 PM by Nothing Without Hope
(No info other than the name in the OP on this one, but it was the first up and has extensive discussion):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1889112
thread title (10/31): Samuel Alito Named Nominated Bush for USSC.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2203367
thread title (10/31): Dean: Bush shouldn't use nomination of extreme conservative to distract.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1889258
thread title (10/31): Parties Set Stage for Showdown on Ct. Choice (Reid warned Bush on Alito)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. Walt Starr's thread with 124 votes (so far) in just twelve hours:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2202281
thread title (10/31): Message to the Dems: SHUT IT DOWN!!!!

Here is what he says in the OP - though don't let this spoiler keep you from going and voting and adding to that discussion:


Talk is cheap. Time to pay the piper. These are extraordinary circumstances. Filibuster and force a nuclear confrontation. If the GOP nukes, SHUT IT DOWN!!!

No more money for anything. No more legislation on anything. No more nothing. Shut down the goddamned governement for as long as it takes. Force every last bill and every last amendment to be read in full on the floor of the Senate. No more unanimous consent, recorded votes on every last procedure every last time.

SHUT IT DOWN!!!

We are not playing any more. We are deadly serious. This far and no further. Fight or die. There is nothing left to lose. Fight or die.

SHUT IT DOWN!!!


Of course, he is absolutely right - this is the confrontation we feared and now must stand up for. No weak-kneed Dems, no Republican in Congress ignored with petitions and blasts of attention.

THIS IS IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. This is the problem.
"The President has given in to the right wing's demand to be rewarded for his reelection."

By his presenting a nominee who will not weigh all the possibilities, and explore all the evidence before passing judgments which affect all Americans (judgments which must necessarily treat each of us equally), but instead, presenting a nominee who gives the crazy ideas of the extremist Fundie terrorists weight, shows, as our dear Dems have said in unison today, amazing weakness. We must fight.

Thanks, Hope!

p.s. Thanks for posting all that great stuff in the Group. And thanks for worrying about me. :hug:

Hope, :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm disturbed by the "just give up on fighting Alito" threads popping up
The posters of these threads may well be sincere in their views and mean well, but I find the negative comments - which are not accompanied by any solid information, only personal opinions and hearsay - off-putting and disturbing. These kind of comments make a lot of heat too, but little light. And though without a real argument, they aim to dishearten.

here's an example - see how it strikes you.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2201905
thread title (10/31): I have bad news for you regarding Alito

This is a fight we can't win. Feel free to call your senators and tell them to filibuster if you want but I'm telling you now that guys like Schumer are going to bluster but in the end Alito will be confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. If the GOP can deny Miers an Up and Down Vote the Dems can Filibuster!
I live in Maine and my two repubican women senators (snowe & collins) have always run on supporting women's rights. They will have hell to pay if they don't live up to their promises!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes, we have to FIGHT. And we also need to fight not only on womens'
reproductive rights, but we must make clear the other outrageous positions this extremist, activist judge has taken on civil rights issues (and I'll bet he'd agree with Gonzales on torture and such too!.

Many people sincerely oppose abortion on private religious grounds. But many of those people would still be shocked at the other positions taken by this judge. We have to push out this iniformation and gather more. Here's a start:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2206263
thread title (10/31): Not just Roe - Think Progress gives ALITO's awful civil rights positions:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. Strong agreement on "NOT JUST ROE" and advice to use it as a STRATEGY:
Edited on Tue Nov-01-05 04:25 AM by Nothing Without Hope
The excerpt below is from Steve Gilliard's excellent blog. The poster's take on this situation is actually fairly optimistic in terms of a fight that can be won. A key is to NOT focus SOLELY on Roe v Wade but to publicize the wide range of basic civil rights that Alito is on record as having attacked. The piece ends with a re-wording of some of the points made in the Think Progress piece excerpted in Reply #8 in the current thread.

We REALLY need to attack this candidate on a WIDE front, NOT just Roe vs Wade. And he is VULNERABLE - he has taken radical positions on a variety of civil rights issues. We need to organize and present the information so that even Americans who oppose abortion will see what an extremist he is, and how he would work to further erode our already dangerously diminished civil liberties.

http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2005/11/cry-for-help.html
(posted by gaije, Mon Oct 31, 2005 at 03:28:53 PM PDT)

(snip)

With this nomination, Bush is forcing Republican senators to go on record for or against Roe, as they enter the 2006 campaign season. Two thirds of Americans support Roe v. Wade. The Senate knows that. Any senator who votes for Alito will be saying good-bye to all those votes. Moderate republicans, swing voters, countless previously apathetic voters, will be going Democratic. The Democratic party will be galvanized around a single issue like it hasn't been in years, and its coffers overflowing. For a GOP senator, that's no good, it's no good at all.

Vote against him though, and they'll alienate the religious right. All that reliable fundraising, voter turnout & volunteer manpower down the drain. That's no good either. Apparently, someone forgot to tell Bush he's not supposed to put them in this position (Maybe that was Scooter's job.).

(snip)

Democrats are not going to be able to get behind this one, unless they're looking to retire. Roberts they had to give a little benefit of the doubt, but this one's just impossible. The nuclear option's not going to fly on this one either. Frist's power is somewhat diminished, thanks to that pesky SEC investigation (so many investigations these days, so hard to keep track!). The GOP rank and file are caught between a rock & a hard, hard place here. They may just be thinking a fillibuster's their best out. How many do you really think are going to be willing to fall on their swords for the least popular (and worst) president ever? Their much vaunted "message discipline," has been slipping away for weeks, as they've realized Bush's ship is sinking, and they'd better jump off well before November 2006.

The thing to do here, is to base our opposition to Alito on everything but his anti-Roe potential. It'll take the GOP by surprise, they'll be all prepared with their "litmus test," talking points, and defenseless in the face of other questions. It also offers them some cover for a no vote.

(snip)


I set up a separate thread to emphapsize "NOT JUST ROE" as a strategy to defeat the Alito nomination, quite possibly with the help of at least some moderate Republicans.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2206263
thread title (10/31): Not just Roe - Think Progress gives ALITO's awful civil rights positions:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. Related thread: To Dems: "Either Alito is filibustered or you are DONE"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2202108
thread title (10/31): This is it, Democratic Party, either Alito is filibustered or you are DONE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. Related thread:"Reid on Alito-He's locked and loaded. Give 'em Hell Harry"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2203089
thread title (10/31): Reid on Alito--He's locked and loaded. Give 'em Hell Harry

Partial excerpt:

“The nomination of Judge Alito requires an especially long hard look by the Senate because of what happened last week to Harriet Miers. Conservative activists forced Miers to withdraw from consideration for this same Supreme Court seat because she was not radical enough for them. Now the Senate needs to find out if the man replacing Miers is too radical for the American people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC