Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean was establishment candidate, Not Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kerryistheanswer Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:14 AM
Original message
Dean was establishment candidate, Not Kerry
All those who are constantly attacking Kerry for being an insider and part of the establishment seem to have conveniently forgotten about the growing Dean bandwagon that preceded Iowa. You seem to forget that it was Dean who the media loved and predicted would face Bush. It was Dean who the establishment (gore, afscme, seiu, bradley) endorsed. It was Dean who was written up as winning each and every debate even though some of those performances were less than stellar.

Please read E.J. Dionne's piece in today's Washington Post. He hits it right on the nail.
--------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't just Al Gore, who happened to agree with Dean's position on the Iraq war. Dean also won the support of the Service Employees International Union; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa; New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey and former senator Bill Bradley -- and a slew of other elected officials.

To the extent that a Democratic establishment can be plausibly defined, it is made up of the "super delegates" to the Democratic National Convention. They are the holders of elected office and party officials who automatically get to vote on the party's nominee. As of Monday, according to the CBS News/New York Times count, Dean led Kerry among super delegates, 132 to 74. And when Dean shook up his campaign on Wednesday, he turned to a respected establishment figure, Roy Neel, former lobbyist and longtime aide to Gore.

No, Kerry was not brought back by any establishment. He was brought back by rank-and-file Democratic voters in Iowa and New Hampshire. And what's striking is that while Kerry had across-the-board support in Tuesday's primary here, his constituency was decidedly non-elitist compared with Dean'.

Dean and Kerry, according to the network exit polls, split the ballots of those who said they had postgraduate degrees. But Kerry beat Dean by 2 to 1 among voters without college degrees. Kerry won easily over Dean among union members and also among gun owners. Dean carried well-to-do college towns such as Hanover and Keene. But Kerry beat Dean decisively in the blue-collar bastions of Berlin and Manchester. In Berlin, for example, it was Kerry, 1,149, and Dean, 394.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61946-2004Jan29.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. highly misleading
There are factions in the establishment - Kerry has a big faction of the old line liberal establishment, the one from JFK days, that hasn't had power since then. Dean was originally part of the neo-liberal DLC Clinton/Gore establishment - but there is a split between Clinton/Gore over what to do next, and Dean and Gore have fallen out of favor to some extent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Good Points. But Most of the "Establisment" Backed Dean, Wrote off Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Go to the DLC website and your education will be complete.
Kerry is THE establishment candidate.

Dean '04...The ONLY Hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. That "establishment" is the middle rank of the Democratic party
Dean did NOT get big corporate executives or heavy hitters. He got the endorsement of the middle of the Democratic establishment - that's too his credit I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Misleading too
Dean is no DLC. Kerry is DLC. Go look him up in the DLC directory. You'll find Kerry but not Dean. Yes, Dean was a old DLC member, but since From took DLC over, he quit.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. DLC is behind Clark
Clinton is behind Clark. Kerry is not a Clinton Democrat. He's his own person. He did this with a good Kennedy campaign team, yes. But mostly he did this with old-fashioned hard work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Ha! Kerry is the Yale establishment candidate
Kerry has the backing of half of the plutocrats in America - the other half is supporting Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. He was brought back by rank-and-file Democratic voters

How 'bout that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. How many times does this ridiculous claim have to be made?
Please stop trying to fool yourself. Rest assured, you're not fooling anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. OMG! This is so funny
Does everyone even know what the term washington insider means? Just curious. I just don't feel like we can have this discussion of we're not on the same page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evil_orange_cat Donating Member (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. apparantly not... lol
"Washington insider" seems pretty self explanatory... why don't people get this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. E.J. Dionne hit his thumb with the hammer, not the nail
This reads like someone who had to get an article done by the time the paper went to press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Ad Hominen Attack. How excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. EJ Dionne is not a poster on this thread
At least he has not identified himself as such, therefore, your charge is incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm really beginning to think that all this talk about "establishment"
is an underhanded tactic to cause further division. I have tried to figure out what "the establishment" is and I have failed to come up with anything concrete. It's meaning and existence is so vague that virtually any candidate can be painted to fit on either side. That's just my opinion. Therefore, in my opinion, establishment vs. anti-establishment is a non-issue that is merely distracting some people from the more important issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D G Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Definitely
It's very junior high. "We're the cool kids!" "No, we are!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dean is a war hero, not Kerry
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 11:25 AM by creativelcro
People who did not go to war are the real HEROs. They saved many more lives by not going than by going. They had the guts to stand up to the patriotic memes and do the right thing for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D G Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Divisive, either-or thinking.
Good luck with that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Dean saved no lives except his own.

Another man went in Dean's place to participate. That man may have killed, may have been killed.

No Vietnamese or American lives were saved by Dean's not going.

Dean saved his own skin. I'd respect him if he'd been a CO (Conscientious Objector) who did alternative service for two years, or a war resister/ draft resister (one who refused to register and went to prison for two years.) Those men actively fought against the war by their resistance. I'd have no problem with him if he'd simply gotten a high number in the draft lottery, as Clinton did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. * was Governor of TX and McCain was a Senator
In 2000, * was the "insider", while McCain was like an "outsider". * had all of the support from traditional Repuke sources, while McCain garnered a lot of apolitical types. Dean's hardly an outsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah...and Bush isn't right wing either...


Kerry is the very definition of insider. Sit ont eh fence, play both sides... skip those abortion votes to avoid having them on your record one way or the other.

Dean is an outsider, and the best argument you can come up with is that he has support of some insiders or he hires an insider to help him navigate the system that is dominated by insiders?


And if you have any doubt that Kerry is the insider here... just look at the media coverage. Dean was hammered constantly, and still is being attacked. While Kerry is getting nothing but the softball treatment.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. John Kerry: abortion

Date: 01/21/2003
January 21, 2003
Remarks of Senator John Kerry
NARAL 30th Anniversary Dinner
http://www.johnkerry.com

This is an extraordinary gathering at an extraordinary time. What is at stake is not just the right to choose. Never in my years in the Senate have the rights of women been at such risk – never have women been assaulted in their citizenship here at home or womanhood around the globe as they are by this administration. NARAL is without question the front line defense in this struggle and when judgments are made, the judgment is inescapable that Kate Michelman is one of the most effective and important civil rights leaders in our time. Kate has saved more women's lives and liberated more women than almost anyone and taken on more tough fights than anyone else committed to this cause. We are grateful for all those represented here who are joined in this struggle. I learned much about this as a prosecutor – setting up a rape counseling and victims' assistance unit – I learned about heinous crimes that were all about power – about stripping women of dignity and control over their lives.

And that's what this fight is all about. It's about power. It's about who decides. And it is beyond my comprehension how, on an issue so personal to women, that a bunch of men in the White House or Congress dare to claim rectitude and make this decision and interfere with the freedom and rights of millions of women. Anyone who has talked to or knows a woman who has faced this dilemma knows how difficult, how painful and how lonely it can be. We can't go back to the days of back alleys – days in which women were shamed and put to all kinds of risk. We can't put women in the place where their choice is to break the law and be branded a criminal. As the New York Times put it, this Administration and this Congress is waging a war against women today.

What else can you call their attempts to block women from access to contraceptives – to gag doctors from even mentioning the word abortion to their patients – to freeze funding for family planning across the world – to ban medical procedures even if a woman's health is at stake. We need to stop them from eroding and then destroying this right until they've taken us back to the time before women were truly free.

Nothing we say here diminishes or disrespects someone else's belief or morality. It respects America's fundamental fabric of justice and honors the notion that we don't impose our individual articles of faith on someone else. In reflecting on the Supreme Court's decision in Roe, Justice Harry Blackmun made clear: “It was a step we had to take towards the full emancipation of women.” Lose this right and more than 50 percent of America will not be free. As I said 18 years ago in my maiden speech in the U.S. Senate: “the right to choose is a fundamental right… neither the Government nor any person has the right to infringe on that freedom.” If I get to share a stage with this President and debate him… one of the first things I'll tell him is: “There's a defining issue between us. I trust women to make their own decisions. You don't. And that's the difference.” So it's time we said to this President: “we're not going to let you turn back the clock.”

No overturning Roe v. Wade

No packing of the courts with judges hostile to choice

No denial of choice to poor women

No outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or physical health

No more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world

We need to take on this President and the forces of intolerance on the other side. We need to honestly and candidly take this cause to the country – speak up and be proud of what we stand for. My friends, you won the right to choose. It didn't just happen. People made it happen – women most of all. Now we need to work just as hard to protect it. We need to energize a new generation of citizens who care about freedom – who care about respect for women – and who will stand up and make clear that we can't go back. We will never go back. We will never, ever let this right be taken away!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Dean was first backed to be the "moderate" alternative to liberal Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. the Establishment?
The one peeling off the facial omelette or the secret society whose candidate we can never discover? I don't think they backed anyone. If so they produced both the hopeless and the unprepared. The other party has the steamroller. Ours is rusting in back of the garage while the wine and cheese set slop drinks on the carpet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. They're BOTH establishment candidates
Dean was a centrist governor who kept a staff and office in DC, was more active than most governors in party operations, especially as chairman of the Dem Govs. Assn., where he raised money from the same corporate donors that the DLC raised money from and the same special interests the DNC raises money from. Like any governor should, he developed a web of close relationships with Dc insiders from lobbyists, to federal bereuacrats, to members of congress, raisng money for and from them.

Kerry's been in congress for nearly his whole adult life.

Clark is the only outsider with edwards a distant second. That's just a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. That is probably what it means to run for President: Some Establishment
must be supporting you, or it does not make much sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. this possibly the stupidest theory I have read yet
EJ never was one of my favorite pundits and for good reason. He is just ... well, wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. These are revealing measures of support for John Kerry
No matter what label you put on it, John Kerry did well with rank and file Democrats in the last contests.

Dean and Kerry, according to the network exit polls, split the ballots of those who said they had postgraduate degrees.

But Kerry beat Dean by 2 to 1 among voters without college degrees.

Kerry won easily over Dean among union members and also among gun owners.

Dean carried well-to-do college towns such as Hanover and Keene.

But Kerry beat Dean decisively in the blue-collar bastions of Berlin and Manchester. In Berlin, for example, it was Kerry, 1,149, and Dean, 394.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. yes, both are establishment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. I gotta agree with ya, goodhue
Dennis is the least establishment of any of em...he & Rev Al!


Peace
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nonsense. Dean ran against the Dem-Lite sell-outs
Like Kerry---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. Dean's record is Establishment DLC Centrist poster child.
until he turned anti-war and began to bash the DLC. I'm glad he's standing up for the democratic wing of the party but his supporters have to see that this is a new spin on his politics than when he was Gov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnziii Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. Washington Post ?????
The WP is pro-Bush
Of course they are going to say this they want Kerry as the nominee

Isn't the WP owned by Murdock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. the author Dionne is a solid Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. establishment media's candidate = establishment candidate
And the Whorington Post is the prime example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. unions?!?
When I think of 'the establishment', I don't think of those unions.

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. kicking truth over bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC