Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean Looks Past S.Carolina to Delegate - Rich States

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:25 PM
Original message
Dean Looks Past S.Carolina to Delegate - Rich States
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/politics/politics-campaign-dean.html

Dean Looks Past S.Carolina to Delegate - Rich States
By REUTERS


Filed at 12:29 p.m. ET
COLUMBIA, S.C. (Reuters) - Democrat Howard Dean made perfunctory campaign stops in South Carolina on Friday, all but dismissing the importance of the state's primary contest next week to his foundering presidential bid.

The former Vermont governor, the fallen front-runner who had hoped to go South and West with an aura of inevitability after big wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, is instead struggling to keep his White House campaign afloat, politically and financially.

<snip>"You have to look at the race now from New Hampshire through March 2," said Dean senior adviser Gina Glantz. "That's when most delegates will be selected."

<snip>For Dean's reeling campaign, those choices include visits in the next few days to Michigan and Washington State, which hold their contests on Feb. 7, and Wisconsin, which votes on Feb. 17..Dean is looking down the road past Tuesday's contests in South Carolina, New Mexico, Delaware, Arizona, Missouri, Oklahoma and North Dakota for a lifeline.

<snip> "This race is about the next seven weeks, not the next seven states," Dean spokeswoman Tricia Enright said.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
D G Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh dear... isn't this "ignoring the south"?
I thought that was anathema to a good Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It is, but sometimes you have to make hard decisions
Just like why Clark didn't run in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D G Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, I'm still waiting to hear how skipping Iowa hurt Clark
Looking at the polls, I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Hi D G!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. What happened to the "50-state strategy" many Dean supporters
kept beating us over the head with?

Over and over, the response to many a Dean question was "he's the only one with a 50-state strategy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He had to adapt his campaign to the new realities
He still has a 50-state strategy, a lot of the groundwork has already been laid and thanks to his broad grassroots support, even in states where he can't open an office now, he will still be represented by volunteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I disagree. I think the "50-state strategy" never existed.
You don't spend $40 million on two states if you have a 50-state strategy.

I think that the people who bought into this obvious falsity perpetuated by the Dean campaign were duped. His campaign was just like everyone else's - focus on Iowa (except for Clark/Lieberman, of course) and NH and hope that provides momentum for elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. he is.....he has people working in all states... go Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Foundering" Where do they get journalists and headwritesr these days?
foun·der1 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (foundr)
v. foun·dered, foun·der·ing, foun·ders
v. intr.
To sink below the surface of the water: The ship struck a reef and foundered.
To cave in; sink: The platform swayed and then foundered.
To fail utterly; collapse: a marriage that soon foundered.
To stumble, especially to stumble and go lame. Used of horses.

If you're down to the fourth definition, you have probably selected the wrong word.

If you want to get lost in nautical analogy land, I would agree that Dean is in among the rocks, but he has hardly foundered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D G Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick for "ignoring the south"
If anyone wants to use that against Kerry, please read this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC