ps1074
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-03-06 12:31 PM
Original message |
A link to the counts in the Abramoff charge |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-03-06 12:40 PM by ps1074
Here are the counts in the Abramoff charge: http://www.usnewswire.com/attach/abramoff.pdfPage 9 Count 22 "From in or about 1999 through in or about April 2004, defendant Abramoff, Scanlong and others, together and separate, provided a stream of things of value to a Member of the United States House of Representatives ("Representative #1") and members of his staff, including but not limited to a lavish trip to Scotland to play golf on world-famours courses, tickets to sporting events and other entertainment, regular meals at defendant Abramoff's upscale restaurant, and campaign contributions for Representative #1, his political action committee, and other political committees on behalf of Representative #1."Page 10 Count 24 Beginning in March 2002, defendant Abramoff and former staffer to Representative #1 (Staffer B) contacted representative #1, officials employed by theOffice of Representative #1, and officials employed by a House Comitee ("Comitee"), of which Representative #1 was the chairman. These contacts occured within one year of Staffer B having served as the Staff Director of the Comitee and Chief of staff of Representative #1. Defendant Abramoff intended that Staffer B make these appearances and communications for the purpose of influencing official action on behalf of defendant Abramoff's and Staffer B's clients, including Texas Tribe #1 and Wireless Company. Al in violations of 18 United States Code, Section 371.Anyone have doubts the Congressman mentioned is DeLay? (actually it is Ney, sorry) Bye Bye, Asshole.
|
iamjoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-03-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not Yet, Please Not Yet |
|
Let it be too late for the Republicans to field another good candidate for this year's election
:evilgrin:
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-03-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Point of order. This is Texas: they don't need a 'good' candidate |
|
They'll go in with an advantage no matter WHO they run.
Luckily the Dems have a very strong candidate in Nick Lampson :thumbsup:
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-03-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. According to MSNBC this am - Rep #1 is Ney not Delay. eom |
ps1074
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-03-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. I just realized that it is indeed Ney and not Delay |
|
I will change the title of the thread to avoid more confusions
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-03-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes. Representative #! is assumed to be Bob Ney, who is chairman of a big |
|
committee in the House - something like the House Administration Committee, although I may be fuzzy on the committee name.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |