How come Raw Story isnt all over the Amanpour/NBC investigation?

[LeftNYC]

[Caution]

1. no sources?

Working on other things? Not a huge staff or budget?

[LeftNYC]

5. nothing on their site at all...

damn people are defensive...

[Caution]

8. Huh?

I wasn't being defensive i was attempting to provide a speculative answer to your question..if it came off as a kneejerk response, I apologize.

[LeftNYC]

9. Its cool...

Sorry for being jumpy. I think Agent Mike installed cameras in my office this week. A little paranoid.

[benburch]

2. Maybe because they don't have any new information?

They don't make stuff up, you know.

[LeftNYC]

4. They dont...I'm shocked...

i must be an idiot...

[Connie_Corleone]

3. There's nothing to report yet.

Only speculation right now.

[Nordmadr]

6. ...and that is what we are for. :) N/T

[LeftNYC]

7. My apologies to Raw Story

It wasnt meant as an insult as the go to the site everyday, sometimes multiple times. I wonder if i ever do any work. I'm still getting a paycheck, so I must be doing something right.

[ewagner]

10. My theory

is that Raw Story wasn't in on the initial info about Christainne and only picked up on it when Andrea Mitchell let the cat out of the bag. I suspect they are playing "catch-up" right about now; trying to develop sources; trying to get somebody to speak "on-the-record"; basically, just running the story to ground.

There is also a possibility that Andrea let something slip that she only overheard at a cocktail party and may have no basis in fact at all.

[radio4progressives]

11. because it isn't confirmed is my guess

firedog draws a certain conclusion, and it may turn out to be accurate. but it isn't based on confirmed report, it's only based on conjecture extropolated from a certain set of circumstances and yes comments made suggesting on going "inquiry" .