Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My response to my GOP Congressman re: Ed Schultz on AFR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:16 PM
Original message
My response to my GOP Congressman re: Ed Schultz on AFR
To The Honorable Congressman Davis,

You wrote below that "As an eleven year Army veteran, it is clear to me that the Schultz program would enjoy little interest by our troops."

Well, Congressman, it would appear that your time in the military was very far removed from the current situation. Even according to The Military Times, it is now evident that our troops are tired of being pawns for failed ideological warfare:

http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2005_main.php

"Support for President Bush and for the war in Iraq has slipped significantly in the last year among members of the military’s professional core, according to the 2005 Military Times Poll.

Approval of the president’s Iraq policy fell 9 percentage points from 2004; a bare majority, 54 percent, now say they view his performance on Iraq as favorable. Support for his overall performance fell 11 points, to 60 percent, among active-duty readers of the Military Times newspapers. Though support both for President Bush and for the war in Iraq remains significantly higher than in the public as a whole, the drop is likely to add further fuel to the heated debate over Iraq policy. "

Might I recommend you start aligning yourself with the constituents that voted you into office instead of toeing the line of the corrupt Republican Party? You may swallow everything Karl Rove shoves at you but *we* don't!


http://www.surveyusa.com/50State2005/50StatePOTUS1205ByState.htm

Kentucky Bush 42% (Approve) 54% (Disapprove)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow imagine how bad
it would be if they weren't spoon fed freeper drivel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, YEAH!!!!!!
:applause: WELL SAID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, if only our tepid, pukey professional politicians
were so direct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is he trying to get him off AFR? Eddie went on the air Dec 8th on AFR..
Don't tell me he's trying to boot him after all the problems he went through to FINALLY get on?

http://www.bigeddieradio.com/EdInTheNews/more.asp?ID=70

AFR Schedule: http://myafn.dodmedia.osd.mil/radio/afn/schedule.asp (Big Eddie is on AFR 1200 hours Pacific Time)

He even gets callers from the troops that are SOOOOOO happy to have him on the air!!

If they take him off.. they better take Rush off too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No it was a very late-arriving reply from when this was news.
Back when the Pentagon was trying to deny Ed from going on the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ok, thanks! Having Ed on the air has to piss him off then because...
....according to his listeners on AFR, he's a hit!! They're happy to have an opposing voice!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And from Stars and Stripes about Big Eddie being on:
http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=32710&archive=true

Slant head was also added.. but o'well.. at least they finally got Eddie! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC