Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blitzer (GOP Operative)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blueinindiana Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 06:51 PM
Original message
Blitzer (GOP Operative)
Edited on Mon Jan-09-06 06:53 PM by blueinindiana
Wolf boy had to make up for yesterday and brought in the RNC head to ‘Set the record straight’ own the lobbying scandal.

I hate media whores!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jeff Sessions also
You almost expect to see the tobacco drooling out of that cracker's mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would like to see the Democrats blast not only the Republicans on
this story but go after the media as well. I suppose that's biting the hand that feeds publicity but at this point, what have they got to lose? I know Democrats who have bought the spin that some of our own have accepted Abramoff money. I don't mean to be insensitive, but this type of reporting is as bad, if not worse, than the headlines proclaiming some of the miners survived. In both cases we have a decided lack of fact checking. In this case it's not a matter of miscommunication in the midst of time pressure. This is bad. Really really bad for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's time they did this - they're the ones in position to have their views
be heard! We the people certainly can't get our letters read on the air.

and by the way, increasingly I'm starting to see a few like Ted Kennedy manage to get their points through despite these whores..

and one other item - in the last couple of weeks it's been revealed that Chris Matthews had his own connection with the Abramoff's enterprises - which brings up the point that these whores are as much a part of the inside Washington scene, mixing it up with elected officials - and wheeling and dealing, producers and "experts" pundits etc are hired hit people by lobbyists firms - it's all one big cozy family - i think it's time the Feds and the Justice Department start looking into the connection between people like Matthews and Blitzer et al.

Gee, I wonder where Matthews was today? You think he might have been tied up in depositions with the DoJ on the Abramoff case?

hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On Par Donating Member (912 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The ReThugs Have No Shame Going After the Media....
...the Dem's need to do the same, and start with Wolfie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I agree. It's astounding the Republicans could scream "liberal media"
and attack them viciously for bias for years and then manage to exert such iron fisted control over it. What have the Dems to lose by fighting back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. And gave Kenny twice as much time or more than he gave Howard Dean.
Altho Dean, in comparison with Melhman who didn't look too good today (wonder why?, kicked butt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. So how does their argument refute "Democrats did not receive
money from Jack Abramoff"?

Wouldn't they have to admit that it isn't just who you recieve the money from, but also what happens to money after it is recieved by one of the players (i.e. "laundering")? Talking about that could implicate more of their own.

So what WAS their rebuttal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The rebuttal?
A deep sigh and a "well that's all the time we have now...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC