Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush recess appointments disgraceful

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:12 PM
Original message
Bush recess appointments disgraceful
NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/09/opinion/09mon1.html?th&emc=th

President Bush at Recess

Published: January 9, 2006

It is disturbing that President Bush has exhibited a grandiose vision of executive power that leaves little room for public debate, the concerns of the minority party or the supervisory powers of the courts. But it is just plain baffling to watch him take the same regal attitude toward a Congress in which his party holds solid majorities in both houses.

<<snip>>

Among those Mr. Bush unilaterally elevated to important posts this time around was Julie Myers, a government lawyer with ultrathin credentials whom Mr. Bush appointed to head the 15,000-person Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, the government's second largest investigative force.

Also on the list was Ellen Sauerbrey, the unqualified political crony Mr. Bush chose to head the billion-dollar-a-year State Department office that helps coordinate emergency relief efforts for refugees abroad, and whose nomination had stalled for just cause in the Foreign Relations Committee.

Mr. Bush also bypassed Senate hearings on a new deputy defense secretary and for three of the six seats on the Federal Election Commission. The election commission appointees include Hans von Spakovsky, a Justice Department lawyer who overrode the objection of career lawyers to gain approval of a Georgia voter identification plan almost certain to harm black voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some dare call it chickensh*t.
For some d*mn reason Chimpy takes an end run around the normal process of confirming appointments and puts in the lightweight croneys. Then he takes the hit when they prove themselves incompetent. On the one hand, it serves him right. On the other hand, we can't take much more ineptitude from his appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you would think...
they learned their lesson already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. What, really, is the precedent?
The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.

Article II, Section 2, para. 3, United States Constitution


It seems to me that the President may only issue recess appointments if the vacancy occurs while the Senate is in recess and not just because there is a vacancy while the Senate is in recess. Does anyone know if either interpretation has actually been tested? Would it be possible for the President to simply appoint Alito to the Supreme Court during, say, the Senate's summer recess even if he is voted down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Excellent find!
Maybe we need to send this to our Senators as a little reminder that there is a whole lot of usurping going on at the WH. In fact, I wonder if we could organize meetings with them to let them know this is a major concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But if the precedent has always been vacancies *during* a recess...
Then the precedent is there and we just have to live with it.

If all -- or at least most -- recess appointments in the past have been vacancies that occured while the Senate was in recess... that becomes a different legal matter entirely, and a case can be argued that what * is doing is unconstitutional. Oh, I hope annonymous me didn't just annoy the President :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. i think...
we all annoy the pretzeldent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Looks like the issue
has not been addressed directly. See Evans v. Stephens, 125 S.Ct.1640, cert denied.
The cases would be precedents, the behaviors are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. good question n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Second that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. will help fix elections...
Mr. Bush also bypassed Senate hearings on a new deputy defense secretary and for three of the six seats on the Federal Election Commission. The election commission appointees include Hans von Spakovsky, a Justice Department lawyer who overrode the objection of career lawyers to gain approval of a Georgia voter identification plan almost certain to harm black voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC