Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can a senator ask Alito: "Would you be upset if a close family member

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:09 PM
Original message
Can a senator ask Alito: "Would you be upset if a close family member
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 06:16 PM by Maraya1969
wanted to have an abortion?"

EDIT: to clarify I'm watching the Alito questioning now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can who ask? Under what circumstances?
And why the HELL would it be the business of anyone but the woman who felt her life at risk from an unwanted pregnancy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sorry - I am watching the Alito hearing and he is being pressured
to answer his opinion on Roe. v Wade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. did they ask that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. NO but no one can ever get a clear answer as to whether the person
is pro-life or pro-choice. I see all sorts of interesting ways that they have come up with questions that will make Alito ANSWER and yet he still have wiggled out of them and not answered it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. i'm sure they had him practice answers before the hearings. they
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 06:33 PM by catmother
knew that this would come up.

from what i've heard when ruth bader ginsberg was nominated she refused to answer questions. but with her everyone knew where she stood and how she would vote. so now they all think they can pull that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Why is it anyone else's business what the woman decides---for
any reason whatsoever. No man should be able to make a law that states what a woman can do with her reproductive rights. No-one makes a woman have an abortion, she chooses to or not. This issue should be about personal rights and not at all about politics. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree 100% The problem is if we end up with one more far right Supreme
court justice abortion may become ILLEGAL. Opinions aren't going to matter then. It would be a horror story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. i bet they could ask but i think the chairman would object and even if he
didn't i think the nominee could decline to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Can they just come out and ask; "Do you consider yourself pro-life
or pro-choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i think the same applies, yeah they could ask, they used to i think but
again the chairman would put a stop to it or he could decline to answer with something like "I will follow the law of the land"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well he just did
What a softball question, but no real surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Missed it. What was his answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. He did a two step around it just like the others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elsiesummers Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's men making and judging these abortion laws - is this apartheid?
Seriously, the laws and the judgements are made by men. These men are not bound by these laws (because they cannot be pregnant) and the laws are in fact pertaining to a group, a class, that they are not a member of.

Let's face it, this is apartheid - that men make laws about a group, a seaparate group, that they make laws that don't apply to themselves, it is no better than slavery. It is the American caste system.

We women are still completely controlled and dominated by men. Look at how men are actually ruling women, and also look at the Martha Stewart conviction - the message of it - that women who overstep will be taken down.

Women really have no rights, and it is time we face up to who we are in this society. We are nothing, unless men choose to allow us some sort of status that they can take away.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC