Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:09 PM
Original message |
Can a senator ask Alito: "Would you be upset if a close family member |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 06:16 PM by Maraya1969
wanted to have an abortion?"
EDIT: to clarify I'm watching the Alito questioning now.
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Can who ask? Under what circumstances? |
|
And why the HELL would it be the business of anyone but the woman who felt her life at risk from an unwanted pregnancy?
|
Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Sorry - I am watching the Alito hearing and he is being pressured |
|
to answer his opinion on Roe. v Wade
|
catmother
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. did they ask that question? |
Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. NO but no one can ever get a clear answer as to whether the person |
|
is pro-life or pro-choice. I see all sorts of interesting ways that they have come up with questions that will make Alito ANSWER and yet he still have wiggled out of them and not answered it.
|
catmother
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. i'm sure they had him practice answers before the hearings. they |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 06:33 PM by catmother
knew that this would come up.
from what i've heard when ruth bader ginsberg was nominated she refused to answer questions. but with her everyone knew where she stood and how she would vote. so now they all think they can pull that shit.
|
yy4me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. Why is it anyone else's business what the woman decides---for |
|
any reason whatsoever. No man should be able to make a law that states what a woman can do with her reproductive rights. No-one makes a woman have an abortion, she chooses to or not. This issue should be about personal rights and not at all about politics. Just my opinion.
|
Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. I agree 100% The problem is if we end up with one more far right Supreme |
|
court justice abortion may become ILLEGAL. Opinions aren't going to matter then. It would be a horror story.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
4. i bet they could ask but i think the chairman would object and even if he |
|
didn't i think the nominee could decline to answer.
|
Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Can they just come out and ask; "Do you consider yourself pro-life |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. i think the same applies, yeah they could ask, they used to i think but |
|
again the chairman would put a stop to it or he could decline to answer with something like "I will follow the law of the land"
|
knight_of_the_star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What a softball question, but no real surprise.
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Missed it. What was his answer? |
Maraya1969
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-10-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. He did a two step around it just like the others |
elsiesummers
(723 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-11-06 02:50 AM
Response to Original message |
14. It's men making and judging these abortion laws - is this apartheid? |
|
Seriously, the laws and the judgements are made by men. These men are not bound by these laws (because they cannot be pregnant) and the laws are in fact pertaining to a group, a class, that they are not a member of.
Let's face it, this is apartheid - that men make laws about a group, a seaparate group, that they make laws that don't apply to themselves, it is no better than slavery. It is the American caste system.
We women are still completely controlled and dominated by men. Look at how men are actually ruling women, and also look at the Martha Stewart conviction - the message of it - that women who overstep will be taken down.
Women really have no rights, and it is time we face up to who we are in this society. We are nothing, unless men choose to allow us some sort of status that they can take away.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |