Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Questions. How can the Dems filibuster if they are all being timed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:52 PM
Original message
Questions. How can the Dems filibuster if they are all being timed?
I know this may be stupid but I've never seen what a filibuster looks like although I bet it would be a hoot.

But that neon red timer is set for everyone to follow. :shrug: Maybe they can keep calling new witnesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. they filibuster on the floor of the Senate
after the hearings are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. this is the committee hearing not the Senate vote
Alitos nomination must get out of Committee and be presented to the Full Senate for vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trackfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. What you are currently seeing is just the committee hearing
If the nomination should go to the whole Senate for a vote, there is no limit on the debate, unless it is agreed to by the Senate itself. In order to get to a final vote, the Senate would have to agree to cloture, which is to set a fixed limit, and a cut-off for the debate. If 41 senators refuse to allow the debate to end, that is a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Alito gets to the Senate as a whole, they will debate his nomination
then there will be a vote to stop debate, known as a vote for cloture. If it doesn't pass, that's considered "filibustering."

Kind of disappointing really. I'd like to see something alittle more like "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington." I wonder when they stopped having that kind of filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I just looked up "Mr Smith" transcript. This line floored me.
Smith: Mr. President, I stand guilty as framed!


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't it wonderful.. even if cringing while worrying about the result
watching the process is always a great lesson in civics. Of course, I'm a political junkie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not stupid.
That was a great demonstration of logic to arrive at the question, which was answered above-thread.

Remember, Ignorance is correctable, stoopud is for life.

-Hoot

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well thank you hoot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not stupid at all - it's kind of confusing
As others said, this is the Committee hearing - filibusters happen after the Committee votes on the nomination.

But filibusters like in the movies don't happen anymore - Senators usually don't stand on the floor talking hour after hour. Now, a filibuster occurs more as a formality - it really is just the minority refusing to close off debate and allow a vote to be taken on a measure. In such a case, the filibuster ends if 60 senators vote to cut off debate and vote on the issue. If they don't get 60 yes votes (regardless how many no votes there are), they can't vote on the measure at hand.

Not as dramatic or exciting as it used to be. But more manageable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC