Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wash. Post Falsely Claimed Blunt's Wife isn't a lobbyist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:06 PM
Original message
Wash. Post Falsely Claimed Blunt's Wife isn't a lobbyist
(cleaning House to Republicans seems to be voting
in the lesser of a lot of evils)

http://mediamatters.org/items/200601120001

Thu, Jan 12, 2006 12:00pm EST

Wash. Post falsely claimed Blunt's wife does not lobby Congress

Summary: The Washington Post falsely reported that the wife of acting House Majority Leader Roy Blunt "does not lobby Congress." In fact, Abigail Blunt is a registered lobbyist for Philip Morris, as she was in 2002, when Blunt tried to modify Homeland Security legislation in a way that would have benefited Philip Morris.
In an article in the January 11 edition of The Washington Post, staff writer Jonathan Weisman falsely reported that Abigail Blunt, the wife of acting House Majority Leader Roy Blunt (R-MO), is not a congressional lobbyist. In reporting on a move in 2002 by Blunt to modify Homeland Security legislation in a way that would have benefited tobacco manufacturer Philip Morris, Weisman noted that Abigail Blunt -- then Abigail Perlman -- was a lobbyist, but he then wrote that "he does not lobby Congress." In fact, not only is Abigail Blunt currently registered as a congressional lobbyist, she lobbied Congress for Philip Morris at the time. Though she and Blunt were not married, they reportedly had a "personal relationship."

The weblog Fired Up! America was apparently the first media outlet to note the Post's error in reporting that Abigail Blunt "does not lobby Congress."

Rep. Blunt first took heat for the move in summer 2003 after a Washington Post report in June 2003 disclosed his involvement with Philip Morris. Democrats criticized the 2002 attempt to add a measure to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 intended to reduce cigarette smuggling, a provision many claimed was designed to benefit Philip Morris. At the time he was attempting to modify the Homeland Security Act, Blunt reportedly had a "personal relationship" with Perlman, a lobbyist for the tobacco giant. They married in 2003.

continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Repubs delude themselves if
they think of Blunt as "the lesser of two evils". But it's fine with me if they do. The more they keep on doin' what they've been doin', the sooner they lose power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Easy to verify this kind of shit too
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 05:53 PM by pk_du
http://sopr.senate.gov/cgi-win/m_opr_viewer.exe?DoFn=0

go here...choose "lobbyist name"...type in Blunt (there are only 2) and one of them is "Abigaul P Blunt" - lobbyist working for "Altria corporate services Inc" (otherwise known as Philip Morris)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure why there are lines through some of the text....
moderators, elad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. the quoted text includes an editor's mark
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 06:26 PM by Karmakaze
On edit: Let me try this again - I forgot about the different
encoding on this software.

The reason the text is struck out is because the quote you
posted contained an editor's mark showing that a "S"
was changed into a "s".

In the forum software [s] tells the browser to render the
following text as strikethrough. So take out the [ and ] and
that should fix it.

The line will look something like this:

but he then wrote that "[s]he does not lobby
Congress."

so just change it to:

but he then wrote that "she does not lobby
Congress."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ok
I have no idea how to do that, so read through the lines.
Thanks for the info though :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You should be able to edit the post...
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 06:39 PM by Karmakaze
and just remove the two brackets.

In any case you have to be careful when posting anything with the square brackets or the angle brackets (or greater than/less than) in it. Those are special characters that denote html. So anything that appears between them will disappear, and if the word or letter means something in html strange effects can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think I'll just leave it alone...go to the site to read whole thing...
thanks tho!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's an unpleasant situation concerning Abby Blunt and husband
Only had time for a very quick google grab, and found this immediately:
Abby, wife of Rep. Roy Blunt (R-K Street), and a lobbyist for Altria, has shifted her lobbying focus from cigarettes to cookies. Altria is the parent company for cigarette maker Phillip Morris.

Abby and Roy were previously embroiled in controversy when just after attaining his leadership post (scroll down), Roy slipped a special provision into the Homeland Security bill that directly benefitted Phillip Morris. Abby and Roy were personally involved at the time, but not yet married.

The outcry was so severe, even from Republicans, that the provision benefitting PM was later removed.
(snip/)
http://www.firedupmissouri.com/node/2389

Predictably creepy, isn't it?



Roy and Abby Blunt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC