Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Gergen: The Conservatives achieve greatest success in 40 years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:18 PM
Original message
David Gergen: The Conservatives achieve greatest success in 40 years
On Larry King: he said the Dems fault was not highlighting that this is the conservatives' greatest success in 40 years, what they have been working for for 40 years. Sadly, I think they are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The most egregious activism of the Supreme Court of the US was
stepping in to decide Bush v. Gore." (Larry King show tonight -- just heard it.)

Just curious:

How did the court split on that decision; I'd just like to know how the nine justices voted -- did Sandra Day O'Connor decide it or Kennedy? It was 5 - 4 I believe, wasn't it?

I need someone with a firmer grip on the research on this case from 2000.

Thanks in advance!

In peace,

Radio_Lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sandra Day, who we all applaud as so "moderate"
was the decisive vote. I have no love lost for that Republican tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Adigal, I though that was the case, but wasn't sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Actually Kennedy should be considered the decisive vote...
both O'Connor and he voted with the majority, but afterwards it came out that Kennedy was really torn, and might have gone the other way. Sandra had no qualms--Miss Moderation is simply a political tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. The five that voted for Bush
in Bush v. Gore were Scalia, Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas, and O'Conner.

O'Conner is also said to have made a statement on election night when FL was called for Gore, "Oh, no and I wanted to retire under Bush".

But compared to Alito, O'Conner was definetely a moderate, especially on choice, church and state issues, and certain other cases.

I really loved Mitchell's comment about Bush v. Gore. It was very direct and I noticed Drier had little to say about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Dems do not control the Senate. They are the minority.
There's really nothing the Dems can do to stop Alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Oh, yes, they can...FILIBUSTER!!!
and if the Repubs go nuclear, shut the goddamn Senate down!! We are being ruled by a man who was not even elected the first time and elected on lies the second time. He has 38% approval rating - even my wingnut friends are desperate for someone to get us the hell out of Iraq, and fix our economy.

This man has no right to his nominee. The media has no right to scream at us when they never screamed at all that he has done.

Screw him...filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adarling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. he was correct in his statement
this is probably the most balanced group of people they have had for a political discussion, probably because maher wanted that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think he's right that stacking the USSC has been a long-term goal.
What I wonder is, what Republican VOTERS think THEIR victory has been??

If they want affordable energy, healthcare, peace and security, what has BushCo delivered?

Most Americans want abortions to be safe and legal; most want freedom of religion; most want a clean environment, an independent "non-activist" court, strong schools -- what has BushCo provided?

If they want terrorist attacks, unnecessary wars, budget deficits, wasted tax dollars on the sky-high national debt, pollution, corruption, lies, torture, job exportation, misuse of the military, undermining the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, spying on Americans, backing out of international treaties, and loss of credibility around the world -- I guess they got that... But I can't believe they really DO want that.

Was it really all about tax cuts, praying, and gay marriage -- is that what made the 02 and 04 elections even close?!?

It's just hard to fathom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Republicans have a lot of 1 issue voters
Most Americans are pro-choice, but most pro-choice voters are not single issue voters. I'm guessing that a good half of the anti-abortion crowd are single issue voters.

Most Americans want gun control. Yet, I'm guessing that many in the NRA vote Republican because they want their guns and no restrictions. A guy I know who should be tailor made to vote Democrat - crappy job, no health insurance, poor health overall, no job training, etc - will always vote Republican because he's afraid Democrats will take his guns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You may be right.
They always seem to be afraid of one thing or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. The election was close cause the media did not do their job, same as 2000.
And, until they do, we have an uphill climb, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Nah, it's the electorate that didn't do its job.
The problem isn't that some yo-yo on TV failed to spoon feed political news and analysis properly to the American public. The problem is that too many Americans let the TV do their political thinking for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. If the media fails to accurately inform the voters, they're prime culprits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. So how is it that you are properly informed if the media isn't working?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. We may have swayed some of the public to our side,but unfortunately
the outcome would be the same- all of the majority party Republicans will vote for him and he will become the latest justice.
Alito seems like such a suck up and apparently has been more than willing in the past to present information and positions about himself that will impress those he is seeking employment with, it might just be that he is doing it once again. Everything he has done up to this point has been primping for this position,IMO. Maybe he'll end up fooling us all once he doesn't have to be concerned about losing his job. JMO- trying to present a possible,though unlikely, silver lining in this appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Alito seems a congenial man who very much bows to authority--not good!
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 01:10 PM by flpoljunkie
Not good, at all--especially with the lawless and imperial Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. This is the face of Republicanism
Eisenhower was a military man, like Wes Clark. Not a politician. He is not representative of the Republican Party or any party. Other than Eisenhower, what great Republicans are there? None. They're either zealots like Poppy and Nixon, or lackeys like Reagan and Ford. But they ALL believe God should be in the public square and that government's job is to protect commerce. The neocons are a unique bunch, but Pat Buchanan Republicans aren't worth a shit either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Gergen's a pig...
interesting how at the repukes greatest success comes their greatest scandal. Repukes have an uncanny ability to break the law and then play the victim when caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Actually, Gergen didn't say this in a crowing way --
I was watching, and he said it in the context that the Dems weren't able to communicate to the people the importance of Alito's nomination. Of course, that's hard when the press makes Mrs. Alito's crying jag the lead story, and, I think, most people don't understand, and/or are not interested in, Constitutional issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. That's two thirds of the problem
We live in such a self gratifying society in which something acutely and directly affects you, everybody got this two second attention span and doesn';t want to read or think past the fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's right. The GOP has wanted this for 40 years.
Now they will get a right wing nutcase on the USSC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
20. Well, bully for the conservatives, then.
:bounce: Yay conservatives! :bounce:

You worked your ass off for forty years to "win," because you see all this shit as some big game, not the real live experience it is, as if it's all just moves on a chessboard and the losses don't have a human toll. You act as if we ought to be proud of you for working so hard to make everyone else's lives much harder. You conscienceless fucks.

:bounce: We're all so proud of you! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. The Pubs success is proof/confirmation Humanity is a MISTAKE/an ABBERATION
Take a look at the Planet lately??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. And it only cost us one democracy and one planet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC