Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anyone name ONE thing we got right in this war ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 02:51 PM
Original message
Can anyone name ONE thing we got right in this war ?
It seems like one mistake after the other :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. We got control of the Iraqi oil fields.
From the perspective of the criminals occupying the white house, that was their primary objective and it has been achieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Oh it must be wrong-turn saturday.
Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'm placing my bet at under 12 posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I give it 15, given its a saturday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. I won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. kudos!
but it did take a while.

:)

you win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It took them years to plan 9/11. And imagine the contacts they
had to make along the way to facilitate the process. No surprise it happened during the oily Bush Administration which seems to thrive in grease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. That was secured when we went into Afghanistan.
Iraq was overreach. The likelihood of 9/11 happening again increased when we created a recruiting opportunity for Al Qaeda by invading Iraq without provocation.

Here's a riddle for you:

How many of the 3 billion Muslims in the world will stand idly by as a country of 300 million pursues an unprovoked war against a country of 26 million mostly Muslim people?

Bonus points if you address the problem of how many of the 300,000,000 are actually Muslim and how many of the 300,000,000 support the war, and of those who support the war, will actually enlist to fight in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. "A realistic chance of winning"
Here are more riddles for you:

How many suicide bombers will it take before you realize that too many don't care to stick around for the end game?

And... if we're losing 2,000 soldiers to their 15,000 civilians, how many Americans would die if a few tens of millions of Muslims decided to put up a fight against us?

We wouldn't really have to die by bullets since our entire public infra-structure would collapse with the appearance of one lethal airborne virus.

Is that a future worth risking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. oh, but Madrid and London get bombed...
nearly 2,500 american servicemen and women dead, and 80,000 maimed and wounded, over 100,000 innnocent iraqi citizens killed for nothing...


oh well, shoots you theory to hell, don't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. No you implied a cause and effect relation
That, my friend, is a theory and it is entirely lacking in facts to back it up. Perhaps you would like to expand on your theory here, explaining exactly how our unprovoked attack on Iraq has prevented another 9-11 scale attack inside the US?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. If Iraq was behind 9/11, they would have been prepared for the
second wave of a military strike. Don't you think it's absurd that a recognized soverign nation would just hit and run like that without having a contingency plan?

Not a chance that Iraq was behind 9/11. Not a chance. Sadaam Hussein was not ready for us because he didn't have advanced warning about 9/11. He wasn't in on the plans.

9/11 is exactly what a small, but organized band of men would pull off. Though, it's getting more and more difficult to believe that the Bush Administration didn't see it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Thank you for a new bookmark.
Not only do I agree with you, I really appreciate your posting the Downing Street Memo site. I wasn't aware of it. Many thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Your fact is overreaching.
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 06:19 PM by The Backlash Cometh
We detained Al Qaeda,for the moment, when we attacked Afghanistan. We created more problems for ourselves down the future when we attacked Iraq, a country which never intended to put up a fight...until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Multi-national oil companies with strong ties to conservative US
politicians managed a hostile take-over of oil contracts with Iraqi oil firms; boxing out the Russians and the French who had spent years working for them diplomatically.

And as an extra bonus, no oil company executive was harmed in this manuever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Millions of anti-war marchers and
peace loving human beings all over the world got it right in predicting senseless death and destruction before this whole damn war got started; Other than that, not one freakin' thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. More transfer of the nation's wealth to Halliburton, et al.
Also, the poor and middle class fight the war with zero contributions from Bush's base. Those two have come off as no doubt planned from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. To be fair...
Saddam Hussein WAS the leader of Iraq, just like we were told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. JackintheGreen good point--- LOL
And I would like to add, in the summer, in Iraq, the desert is hot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. pleas please please read "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man..."
...by John Perkins. The invasion and occupation of Iraq has been an enormous success by several measures. For example, literally hundreds of billions of dollars have been funneled into U.S. major engineering firms, oil companies, and the Pentagon. The occupation keeps a lock on one of the most strategic countries in the ME. Nevermind that this is all evil as can be-- truthfully, the only real failures of the Iraq war have been little more than public relations matters, at least from the perspectives of the folks who are its driving forces. If the war brings down the Bush presidency it will STILL be a stunning success.

The only way out of this going to be a very fundamental shakeup of the American social and political order. Frankly, I don't see that happening very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. When do we get our cut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. interesting post.
and thanks for reminding me I need to read that book. i knew that already but forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. the "Economic Hit Man" has killed again ...
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 06:06 PM by welshTerrier2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. yep-- that was the thread that reminded me to read the book...
...and I'm still reeling. Suddenly, things like the war against Iraq don't look like such an abyssmal failure after all, at least not in that context. The corporatocracy will come out on top in the end, and the empire will benefit. It's amazing, too, how many of the same old players are still in the game.

Thanks for the tip-- I just ordered "The Sorrows of Empire."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. you're going to be dangerous!!
"Confessions" was intense ... it was told through the author's eyes in the first person ... the book combined a devastating history lesson of exactly what Perkins' was recruited to do ... very powerful and informative ... at times though, i thought his "spy novel" feel to the book weakened the case he made ... not a major criticism ... it seemed to me he hoped to have the book made into a movie ...

"Sorrows", on the other hand, is a fairly serious scholarly work ... each page is more powerful than the one that preceded it ... it's a massive undertaking and does a masterful job showing you a critically important "other view" of US history ...

the two together make a devastating one-two punch ... read them both in sequence and you're going to be dangerous ...

btw, i haven't read Johnson's "Blowback" which is also supposed to be excellent ... maybe i'll have to add that one to the queue ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. We succeeded in neutralizing the US military!
By having our troops stuck in the quagmire of Iraq, the Bush dictatorship no longer has the troops to attack other countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, etc.

Millions are alive today in Latin America because we are dying in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. It SHOULD have gone wrong. It was illegal and immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Yep, No Good Comes From What They Did
it was so fucking predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
33. YES I can pick me pick me pick me
How to break the law and get away with it. In more ways than one. And if you want to add Grand Theft too, I'm ok with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. Which War are you talking about
The "War on Drugs" or the "War on Poverty" or the "War on illegal immigration" or the "War on Christmas" or the "War on ?????" Maybe the "War on Iraqi Civilians"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
35. Had no trouble finding the museums to loot and Saddam's
best hiding place for 100% protection. (Green zone)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. massively increased and perpetual chaos
rationale for a never-ending "war" on "terror"

a base (al qaeda, in Arabic) from which to threaten or launch attacks on Iran or Syria or whoever

HUGE windfall profits for Halliburton, the Carlyle Group and the military industrial complex

Further crippling deficits that will weaken the federal government for generations and cripple our ability to build a better country

a wedge issue to further divide the electorate

mission accomplished

things are going exactly as planned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC