Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's at stake if Alito is confirmed:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 05:56 PM
Original message
What's at stake if Alito is confirmed:
I encourage everyone to click on this link for a detailed discussion, issue by issue, of what Alito's confirmation could mean. Then ask yourself, what is every responsible member of the Senate thinking?

http://www.savethecourt.org/site/c.mwK0JbNTJrF/b.839269/k.67D9/The_Stakes_Issue_by_Issue.htm

What's at Stake: Issue by Issue
Just one or two more rigidly ideological justices like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas could radically change many of our fundmanental rights. The nine-member Supreme Court interprets the Constitution and reviews laws that affect a wide range of our rights as Americans. Right now, the Court is closely divided on important questions, so the people appointed to fill the vacancies expected on the Court over the next few years will have a huge effect on individual Americans’ ability to seek justice in the courts. Just one or two more rigidly ideological justices like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — the justices who President Bush has called his models for Supreme Court appointments — could radically change many of our fundamental rights.

This page outlines, issues by issue, some of the critical rights and protections at risk with the selection of new Supreme Court Justices:
Campaign Finance Reform
Civil Liberties
Civil Rights
Corporate Power and Abuse
Disability Rights
Environmental Protection
Free Speech
Gay Rights
Immigrants' Rights
Older Americans' Rights
Privacy Rights
Public Education
Religious Liberty
Sensible Gun Control
Women's Rights
Workers' Rights

much more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. At stake is the USA, our current lifestyle, the entire free world, and
the life of the planet. But I may be a tad overly pessimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for the link
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 06:22 PM by cosmicdot
probably why ...

"Wal-Mart Mulls Legal Challenge to Md. Law"


January 13, 2006 7:00 PM EST

ANNAPOLIS, Md. - Wal-Mart Stores Inc., faced with a new Maryland law designed to pressure the retail chain into spending more money on health insurance for its employees, is considering a challenge to the groundbreaking legislation.

~snip~


Wal-Mart must feel 'emboldened' for some reason.


Nothing like election fraud to hijack our country. Not only are these Al Gore's appointment slots which were stolen ... they needed the Senate, too, for confirmation purposes. Mission accomplished.
How can anyone of conscience accept a life-time appointment through usurped power? Yet, Mr. scAlito, et al, seem to relish the moment.

What a tragic day for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Umm...Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks. May I add, too, the notion of
Alito's potential to upset the balance of power to benefit the Executive? Alito is a supporter of the unitary executive theory, as are others on the SC. It could come to pass that future SC decisions could give the Executive unprecedented power. At that point, you can pretty much kiss our democratic republic goodbye, as then President would be King.

Time magazine reported that in 2001 Alito acknowledged that he is a strong proponent of the theory of the "unitary executive" under which all executive branch power is vested in the President--and any incursion on it by Congress should be resisted. This theory has been used by the Bush Administration to justify various extralegal activities, including the infamous torture memos. In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Justice Clarence Thomas used the "unitary executive" theory to argue that the Supreme Court's restrictions on the President's unilateral power to lock up US citizens constituted "judicial interference"--a view rejected by the Court's majority.




http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060123/questions_for_alito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What is at stake if Alito is confirmed
All of our basic freedoms!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's just so much easier to list what's not at stake. Let's just says that
it's EVERYTHING that made this country great, what the Founding Fathers and successive generations of patriots have fought and died for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Full blown dictatorship, that's what's at stake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC