I sent this a few minutes ago. My other senator (Murray) is not up for re-election, but I am
going to send her a similar letter, because she needs to prod her colleagues who are up for re-election to consider the greater good. My sense is that a lot of liberal senators are willing to concede the filibuster to support their colleagues who are up this year.
But what about the country? Shouldn't that be the main concern?
Dear Senator Cantwell:
I urge you and the other Democratic senators to filibuster the Alito nomination. This is an extraordinary time calling for extraordinary measures.
I don't need to tell you why the prospect of Judge Alito as Justice Alito is frightening. But in addition to the very real likelihood that civil and privacy rights will suffer, while corporations and the executive branch will be afforded vast new powers in our society, there is the overriding issue of President Bush potentially having committed criminal violations of FISA. He should not be allowed to name a justice until this issue has been resolved. That is an eminently reasonable position for the Senate to take.
One other thing bothers me. I read an article in the Los Angeles Times today that seems to indicate that Democratic senators are unwilling to mount a filibuster solely because of fear that it might cause some of them to lose their re-election bids.
Here is a snip from the article (and the URL for the article):
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/scotus/la-na-alito14jan14,0,8432.story?coll=la-news-politics-supreme_court<quote>It appears the only way Senate Democrats could block Alito's confirmation would be to mount a filibuster. Although some party activists are calling for one, Senate Democratic leaders have shown little enthusiasm for the idea, in part because it could create problems for party members facing reelection in Republican-leaning states.
"The fact is that a filibuster would put moderate Democrats from 'red' states and others up for reelection in a difficult position," said a senior Democratic aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity when discussing the party's strategic thinking on the Alito nomination.<end quote>
I realize that you are up for re-election this year, and that it may be a tough battle. I completely support you and will volunteer in your campaign. However, it concerns me that any senator would consider his or her own re-election to be more important than preventing the lifelong appointment of a Supreme Court justice who is likely to provide the pivotal vote that would adversely affect the democratic principles, including the rights of individuals, in this country for decades to come. His deference to executive authority is equally troubling.
I hope you will see that this decision whether to filibuster is one that transcends the aspirations of individual senators, and urge you and your colleagues to filibuster this nomination, which truly meets the definition of "extraordinary" in every sense.
Sincerely,
----
b_b