Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Bush's Tide Not Ebbing Soon"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 07:08 AM
Original message
"Bush's Tide Not Ebbing Soon"
http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060115/NEWS/601150403/1039

Democrats couldn't trump Alito and say the court is becoming out of step.

By ADAM NAGOURNEY,
RICHARD W. STEVENSON

WASHINGTON -- Disheartened by the administration's success with the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., Democratic leaders say that President Bush is putting an enduring conservative ideological imprint on the nation's judiciary, and that they see little hope of holding off the tide without winning back control of the Senate or the White House.

In interviews, Democrats said that the lesson of the Alito hearings was that this White House could put on the bench almost any qualified candidate, even one whom Democrats consider to be ideologically out of step with the country.

That conclusion amounts to a repudiation of a central part of a strategy Senate Democrats settled on years ago in a private retreat where they discussed how to fight a Bush White House effort to recast the judiciary: to argue against otherwise qualified candidates by saying they were taking the courts too far right. Even though Democrats thought from the beginning that they had little hope of defeating the nomination, they were dismayed that a nominee with such clearly conservative views -- in particular a written record of opposition to abortion rights -- appeared to stir little opposition.

Republicans said that Bush, in making conservative judicial choices, was doing precisely what he said he would do in both of his presidential campaigns, and indeed that his re-election, and the election of a Republican Congress, meant that the choices reflected the views of much of the American public...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are a lot of ways to get around or impeach a criminally appointed...
...Supreme Court IF WE CAN RESTORE OUR RIGHT TO VOTE!

Throw Diebold and ES&S election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor' NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. It may be necessary to enlarge the size of the Court someday
Lest we forget that the Constitution permits Congress to set the size of the Court, and it has not always had just 9 members. What FDR proposed in 1937 was perfectly legal. Once the political tide changes in this country, and it will someday, then it may be necessary to enlarge the Supreme Court so that the judiciary is not an obstacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Problem with this proposal
It sets a bad precedent. Do we really want the Rebublicans deciding that the court isn't being conservative enough and that they need to expand it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. I knew it was Nagourney before finishing the title
Although as a rule he has "Democrats" in the title - as in "Democrats panicked..." Democrats in retreat..." Democrats unable to..."
Why is Nagourney's crap even posted on DU?
Ruslut is doing fait accompli psy ops as well - it must be the talking points from WH. Stop repeating them here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Damn right. Just look at The Daily Howler archives. This guy is
no friend of the Democrats. He wrote some awful articles about Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC