Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon's Joe Conason: "Alito's Ugly Association"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 04:24 PM
Original message
Salon's Joe Conason: "Alito's Ugly Association"
In his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Alito said that while he didn't remember much about CAP, he thought he would have joined only because of his anger about the banishment of ROTC from the Princeton campus. (He had joined ROTC after getting a low number in the Vietnam draft lottery.) That answer undermined his credibility, not only because of his implausible assertion that he doesn't remember the racist, sexist and gay-bashing rhetoric but because by the time he graduated, ROTC was no longer an issue at Princeton.

Young Sam Alito joined the ROTC in 1970, the same year that Princeton trustees voted to end undergraduate military training at the university for a variety of reasons. By the time he graduated two years later, however, the trustees had reinstated Army ROTC programs on campus. (The university's negotiations with the Air Force and Navy broke down, and their ROTC programs did not return to Princeton at that point.)

<>In fact, ROTC was reinstated at Princeton by a vote of the trustees in June 1972--four months before the existence of CAP was announced in the Princeton Alumni Weekly the following October, according to "The Chosen." So when Alito became an alumnus, his motivation to join CAP probably had little to do with his worries about the ROTC, because they had largely been resolved. That issue was never a primary focus of CAP's energies, and by the time Alito mentioned CAP on his résumé in 1985, the ROTC fight had been long forgotten -- but the bitter debate over diversity on campus was still raging.

The testimony of those who know Alito indicates that he is personally free of the racism and sexism espoused by the CAP crowd, and the archives show that he played no active role in the group. But his eagerness to identify with the likes of Davis and D'Souza is unsettling to say the least, especially in a jurist who has proved so unsympathetic to the rights of women, minorities, workers and consumers. Questioning him about CAP certainly was not "guilt by association," as his defenders have whined. He associated himself with those bigots -- and he still hasn't offered a plausible explanation.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/01/13/alito_controversy/index.html?sid=1425855
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it true Bill Bradley was a member?
Heard somewhere former Democratic presidential candidate Bill Bradley was once a member of CAP. Is it true? If so, it kinda kills this line of argument. Has Bradley commented on it yet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bradley joined briefly, but resigned as soon as he realized CAP's agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. About Bradley, from Save the Court website:
http://www.savethecourt.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=mwK0JbNTJrF&b=865791&ct=1776319

snip//
The Road Not Taken (by Alito)

In 1972 CAP invited Bill Bradley, then a basketball superstar with the New York Knicks and one of Princeton’s most famous alumni, to serve on the Alumni Advisory Board of Prospect. <8> According to Bradley, he accepted this invitation, extended “in advance of the first issue” of Prospect, for the sole purpose of helping fulfill what he called Prospect’s “stated goal, namely: ‘to provide constructive criticism . . . making sure that both sides of controversial issues are represented.’” <9>But less than a year after CAP began publishing Prospect, Bradley sent a letter announcing his resignation from the Advisory Board, stating: It is clear to me, after eight months of publication, that Prospect does not desire a balanced view within its pages but prefers to present the right-wing view within the Princeton community… Furthermore, I am in personal disagreement with the viewpoints expressed in most of the articles printed up to this time in Prospect. <10>
snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. too bad bradley doesn't speak up, surely he could get the
media's attention.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Which he then lied about at the hearing
that is enough to filibuster him back to his fascist house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC