referring to those casino "investors" who are "tribe shopping" while the tribes get accused of "reservation shopping."
snip...
This indicates clearly that the United States and Greenville Rancheria recognize that the Greenville Maidu’s proper land request should be limited to Plumas County, California, not Tehama County, California. However, the developer, the Wilmots of New York, have purchased property in Tehama County along Interstate 5. Therefore, the Wilmots want to relocate the Greenville Maidu to this new location. Such relocation will satisfy this out-of-state investor’s appetite for profit. No consideration is being given to the Maidu’s true ancestral territory or the land recognition indicated in the Hardwick case. Again, the focus is on the needs of the investor, not the Tribe or surrounding community.
Legal Counsel for the Greenville Tribe, Judith Albietz, when asked why the Tribe does not have land in Greenville and if a site-search was conducted and how this location was chosen emphasized, “the developer approached the Tribe with this project.” That is taken from the Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Tehama, Tuesday, May 18, 2004. In addition, Ms. Albietz went so far as to say, “the developer of the project, the Wilmots, will be a good partner with Tehama County…the facility will be run by the Wilmots.” Notice she referred to the New York developer and not the Greenville Maidu Indians.
Members of the Committee, should an investor have the right to place a casino in your community, in your congressional districts, by convincing Tribes to make a faulty land claim? I can assure you; an investor’s first priority is not that a Tribe returns to their ancestral lands. Over the years, I have witnessed many Tribes fall victim to empty promises made by investors – hopes shattered and communities overwhelmed. Rather than “reservation shopping,” I have found “tribe shopping” is probably the more appropriate term. It seems that investors, such as the Wilmots from New York, purchase land and then throw a tribe at it and see if they stick. Federal law must be updated through this legislation to prevent these situations such as the one we face in Tehama County.
more...
http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/archives/109/testimony/2005/leslielohse.htm