cantstandbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:47 PM
Original message |
So "states rights" are only meant for red states and only for RW |
|
issues. Never for social justice or liberal causes. That's what it seems to me concerning the Oregon SCOTUS voting breakdown. Only the three most conservative justices dissented from the decision. If this is how the justices feel about patient-approved, assisted suicide, what about the death penalty and especially the death penalty by injection?
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
When you hear Repugs screaming about states' rights, be careful of where you step.
|
Vektor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Always - it's code for "expect no federal protection of your civil |
|
or human rights." When the term "states' rights" is uttered, be afraid.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |