Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Stephen Harper really changed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:20 AM
Original message
Has Stephen Harper really changed?
Is he a changed man?
The packaging of the Conservative leader is certainly different this time and some positions appear to have softened. But, in essence, he's the same old Stephen Harper

Jan. 14, 2006. 11:26 AM
THOMAS WALKOM


"Has Stephen Harper really changed?

The Conservatives don't like to put it that way. They would prefer to say that Liberal attempts to demonize their leader are no longer working and that, finally, Canadians are beginning to see the real Harper.

Nonetheless, the overarching theme of the increasingly successful Conservative election campaign is one of reassurance.

In both style and substance, Harper is trying to tell voters Ñ particularly in Ontario Ñ that the man who once called for a "firewall" around Alberta to protect it from the depredations of the rest of Canada has mellowed.

.... SNIP"

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&pubid=968163964505&cid=1136589010137&call_page=TS_Canada&call_pageid=968332188774&call_pagepath=News/Canada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm getting that "compassionate conservative" vibe from Harper.
And we know how that played out down here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When he thought he had a majority - he tried to slip in some vague
references to judges and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. If moral relativism is so bad - and one cannot assume all poor
Edited on Sat Jan-21-06 08:32 AM by applegrove
If moral relativism is so bad - and one cannot assume all poor people are deserving on help, why do we assume all rich people deserve their tax cuts? Surely some of them own businesses that cost the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC