Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scooter Libby's lawyers to subpoena more reporters...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:26 AM
Original message
Scooter Libby's lawyers to subpoena more reporters...
This was reported on C-SPAN this morning. Well, that should just about settle it. Scooter, you can go home now. Forget that we caused any discomfort. We do apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Trying to make this as messy as possible.
The strategy is make this as painful and public for as many people as possible. The theory is obviously that no one has the appetite for protracted litigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the more reporters that are subpeoned,,,
The more they are going to start criticizing Fitz. Violating their "constitutional rights," you know. That's really a big deal when it's their rights, while they sit back and let Bush destroy those of the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Personally I think it's a strategy to work towards a mistrial
Edited on Sat Jan-21-06 08:48 AM by HereSince1628
You know the press isn't going to testify willingly indeed the reporters would probably love to be martyred with a contempt of court citation.

If all the reporters refuse to testify, then the defense can argue it is prevented from presenting an effective defense and go for a mistrial.


On edit: If Luskin can get even one reporter to refuse to testify he may be able to get his mistrial.

This strategy is great for the defense. Nothing hangs on scooter's guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Mistrial?
I think after coming this far, they're not going to declare a mistrial just because a couple of reporters wouldn't testify. I imagine the same fate that met Ms. miller would also await any such reporters. A contempt charge and a stint in jail, until they see fit to open their lying pieholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Muddy the waters because reporters have nothing to do with his lying to
Grand Jury. That is what he is charged with, not outing a CIA Covert Agent. What possible reason is there to subpoena anyone? He lied period.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. ...and do we the taxpayer pay scooter's attroney bills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Scooter is HIDING BEHIND REPORTERS AGAIN - what a USER!
again depending on reporters "protecting their sources, etc etc"

I hope they all COMPLY AS QUICKLY as possible and put this slime in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC