Jack A and the Dems - here's how we present it

[Kber]

Jack directed his clients to give specific amounts to specific candidates, including Dems.
So proir to Jack, Dem "X" got , say 100 from client A. After Jack, Dem "X" got, say $50.

So rather that saying jack directed $50 to Dem X, we need to say, Jack instructed his clients to cut their Democratic donations by $50.

And then we need to say that, as a direct result of Jack's activities, Dems received a total of $500 less than they would have otherwise.

Now if someone out there wants to fill in the names and amounts, I think we've got a pretty powerful message.

What do you think?

[Peggy Day]

1. Where's the proof he "directed" anything?

[BlueCaliDem]

3. There *isn't* any proof, because it *never* happened! Why do some Dems

...allow the corporate-owned reich-wing media to brainwash them even to the point they're beginning to believe Dems got money because of Jack-off??

Sheesh!

[sandnsea]

2. Name names

What Democrat got a donation from a tribe who hadn't gotten them before OR advocated for tribes for years. Names and evidence please. That is all.