Casandra
(270 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 12:49 PM
Original message |
|
Even if the issue of 'spying' were, in the final results, considered legal... WHO IS WATCHING THE WATCHERS? This is what bothers me the most. After the knowledge that everytime * opens his mouth, or anyone opens their mouth in his circle, he/they are lying..how do we know that the only spying taking place is as designated. We don't! There is no oversight whatsoever and really, realistically, can't be! How can you oversee 'spook activities'? You can't! So, it's a matter of trust and when that word comes into view, coupled with THIS administration, there is NONE!
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No oversight, no record, no proof, no permission, nuttin'. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |