chaplainM
(744 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 08:18 PM
Original message |
The term, "unitary executive"... |
|
...sounds much better in the original German: Einheitlicher Hauptleiter.
|
ananda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
.. the unilateral executive.
Scary.
Alito has got to be filibustered and kept off the court.
Sue
|
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes, the Dems who are allowed on TV should start using the word dictator |
|
since that's what it means.
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It is not in the Constitution |
|
It is an extra-Constitutional theory being used by those that want the title of Commander-in-Chief to enjoy the same powers and privileges of an absolute monarch.
The fact that it is conservatives who have embraced this un-American theory as one of their own, is proof absolute that conservatism is a fraud! Conservatives who long advocated small and limited government, were only opposed to liberal government. Once in power, they wanted more power than King George III ever enjoyed.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I'd like to know when and where the term originated. |
|
Was it within the last six months? Is it something Karen Hughes concocted?
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I don't know the answer to that |
|
knowing how the Bush dictatorship operates, they would take some innocuous project or idea and twist it for their own purposes.
|
mcscajun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. It apparently goes back at least eight years, perhaps more... |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 09:07 PM by mcscajun
|
InternalDialogue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
but I believe I was listening to The Young Turks when someone explained that the term actually originated several decades ago (possibly the 70s?) when the issue of a federal indictment against the president himself was raised. The argument is that the president is part of the very body (department of justice) that would be used to try him, and therefore was by definition unable to be charged with a crime -- you can't bring charges against yourself. So as "unitary executive," he is immune from criminal charges so long as he heads the executive branch.
From that origin to where it is today, I can't explain.
|
DinahMoeHum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Some of us, of course, call it "urinary executive". |
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. and we are the ones that are getting pissed on |
KakistocracyHater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
9. it's just slang for king |
Uncle Roy
(283 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
11. "monarch" (Greek "monos archein") == "one ruler", ie "unitary executive" |
|
I suspect "autocrat" has a similar derivation.
As opposed to "democrat".
How about sovereign? I see "reign" in there. I bet the "sov" part means me! me! me!
|
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-23-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
12. If anyone's interested in some, um, information |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |