Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember Social Security? Bush on run again, trying to sell illegal spying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:08 AM
Original message
Remember Social Security? Bush on run again, trying to sell illegal spying
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 08:10 AM by ProSense

Bush launches a bid to justify domestic spying


By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | January 24, 2006

WASHINGTON -- President Bush yesterday launched a weeklong blitz of election-style campaigning to build support for his domestic spying program, seeking to persuade the country to uphold his power to bypass laws in the interest of national security -- a power that many legal scholars say he does not have.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/01/24/bush_launches_a_bid_to_justify_domestic_spying/




Impeachment is in the air... I can Smell it


By JWinston70
01/23/2006 03:27:21 PM EST
Keywords: Impeachment, Bush, Cheney, Hastert, Impeach, King George

Be careful of what you wish for... It may just come true. Keep this in mind when looking to impeach the monkey boy, King George!

This week Zogby International released its poll and by a margin of 52% to 43%, Americans want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush if he wiretapped American citizens without a judge's approval, according to a new poll commissioned by AfterDowningStreet.org, a grassroots coalition that supports a Congressional investigation of President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003.

http://www.politicalcortex.com/story/2006/1/20/125837/422




Opinion

''What the President Ordered in This Case Was a Crime"


John Nichols
Mon Jan 23, 12:31 PM ET

The Nation -- While Judge Sam Alito's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee has confirmed that he is not one of their number, a dwindling cadre of public servants still take seriously the dictates of the Constitution and the intents of it authors. And there is no more serious dictate of the document -- and no more solidly established intent -- than the one that requires the Congress to serve as a check and a balance against the excesses of the executive branch. Most particularly in a time of war, the founders intended for the Congress to question, challenge and constrain the president and his aides so that never again would Americans be subjected to the illegitimate, unwarranted and illegal dictates of a King George.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060123/cm_thenation/151824
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. "If we can bomb houses, surely we can wiretap" said Bay Buchanan today
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 08:21 AM by wishlist
Interesting analogy/justification on Good Morning America from right wing spokeswoman Bay Buchanan that if we can bomb houses, surely we can wiretap to fight terrorists! Rather shocking to me, since her statement reveals the right wing dismissal of high potential for innocent people to be casualties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Apart from the WTC, the WH isn't bombing US houses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Was she comparing bombing houses in Iraq to wiretapping Americans on US
soil? That wildly twisted nonsense has a familiar "feel" to it... is she related that RW nut Pat Buchanan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. He and his gang have taken the high road--distracting from the 'illegal'
part of this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalinNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's the same ole crap, terrorism, terrorism, terrorism!
I'm sick to death of this idiot using terrorism as an excuse - I laughed last night when ABC news had him say "I'm the one who will lead us against the war of terrorism"...I think he has that back wards - he's the one leading us into it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Spying on an American Citizen sans a warrant is unconstitutional & illegal
For pete's sake they spied on QUAKERS in Vermont. How much more absurd can this get?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC